Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

[The Answer]

Position: CB
Class: Sr
School: Penn St.
Conference: Big Ten
Ht., Wt.: 6'0, 214
40 Time: 4.52
Grade: 3.56


POSITIVES: Big cover corner who may be better off inside at safety. Heady defensive back with good wherewithal, reads receivers eyes and displays a nice move defending the throw. Uses his frame to box out opponents, hard hitting and works to get involved in the action. Smooth in his hips and loses nothing in transition, always positioning himself to make a play on the ball.

NEGATIVES: Would rather side shuffle than back pedal, plays back on his heels against better opponents and a little stiff with his footwork. Overall game lacks quickness and gets beat off the line by opposing receivers.

ANALYSIS: Best as a nickel corner or in zone unless he takes well to a safety position.

~The Answer

[Mahdi]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Maybe he's best suited as a cover 2 CB. I like his size.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Will he even sniff the field over Kiwauke and Youboty? Might be here in case of any further injuries.

[Earthquake Enyart]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

I love smooth hips.

[Mahdi]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Will he even sniff the field over Kiwauke and Youboty? Might be here in case of any further injuries.

Most likely just depth. Lets run with Youboty. I have a feeling he's a player.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Been a safety for three years

[RedEyE]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

He has to be added depth only. This guy had better not start for Buffalo. I watched him play for Atlanta and it was pure torcher.

[BlackMetalNinja]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Position: CB
Class: Sr
School: Penn St.
Conference: Big Ten
Ht., Wt.: 6'0, 214
40 Time: 4.52
Grade: 3.56


POSITIVES: Big cover corner who may be better off inside at safety. Heady defensive back with good wherewithal, reads receivers eyes and displays a nice move defending the throw. Uses his frame to box out opponents, hard hitting and works to get involved in the action. Smooth in his hips and loses nothing in transition, always positioning himself to make a play on the ball.

NEGATIVES: Would rather side shuffle than back pedal, plays back on his heels against better opponents and a little stiff with his footwork. Overall game lacks quickness and gets beat off the line by opposing receivers.

ANALYSIS: Best as a nickel corner or in zone unless he takes well to a safety position.

~The Answer

I love how you copy stuff from a website and then pass it off and make it look like it's your own by not crediting the proper source... great work

[The Answer]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

I love how you copy stuff from a website and then pass it off and make it look like it's your own by not crediting the proper source... great work

Where did The Answer say this was his work? Please point that out if you are going to make accusations like that - better yet don't waste your time responding if you just want to flame and not discuss football.

~The Answer

[BlackMetalNinja]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

Where did The Answer say this was his work? Please point that out if you are going to make accusations like that - better yet don't waste your time responding if you just want to flame and not discuss football.

~The Answer

It has nothing to do with flaming vs. talking football...

You posted all that info, then put your name directly below it, and no source credited. To 90% of people out there, that implies it's your info. It's not so hard to add the link where you got it after you post info for crying out loud.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

This signing doesnt show much confidence in Wendling or Wilson, especially if the guy wasnt even brought in to be a starter.

I HATE Leonhard being the 3rd safety and now the starter for the rest of the season. I cant believe we couldnt do better than that this offseason.

[The Answer]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

It has nothing to do with flaming vs. talking football...

You posted all that info, then put your name directly below it, and no source credited. To 90% of people out there, that implies it's your info. It's not so hard to add the link where you got it after you post info for crying out loud.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2003/draft/players/356.html

Now please stop trolling The Answer's thread.

~The Answer

[BlackMetalNinja]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/foo...ayers/356.html

~The Answer

Thanks, all I was asking for.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

if you take info from a source and do not provide the source...on top of the fact that it's unethical it's also illegal.

I'm not singling anyone out but I've seen quite a few posters doing this and then not quoting the source where the info is from.

I think a new rule to the HOLY GRAIL should be that if you take info from a source outlet, to quote the source you got it from or provide a link in the very least.

[casdhf]

Re: Scouting Report on Bryan Scott

SOME Holy Grail.