I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pride
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 10191

    I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

    I attended the home opener and watched the pitt game at a bills backers bar.

    At the opener, myself, and those around me were in disbelief at the horrid playcalling. So much so in fact that we analyzed the formation before the snap and tried to anticipate what the play would be.

    Well, by week 2, sitting in the bar... I realized that I was calling 50% of the plays correctly! And this is without study, this is without game film, this is an armchair QB watching a live TV game.

    Here's what I see from the playcalling perspective:

    - Anytime we have a 3rd and 4+, A-Train comes in. 90% of the time A-Train is in there on 3rd and "long", we pass.

    - The formations we are running allow the defenses to stack the box with 9 defenders. When you run out of this formation, you essentially put 9 defenders within 5 yards of the ball. Explain how Lynch is supposed to run through that?

    - Parrish only comes onto the field for 3rd downs it seems.

    - Too many WR screens.

    - If the D is going to stack the box and concentrate on stopping the run. Why aren't we running RB screens to our great handed RB?

    - Our TE's are useless in the run blocking game, putting 3 in on 3rd and 1 does us no good.

    - We are substituting personnel too much.

    Here's what I would do to correct the offense.

    - 1st offensive play of the game I have Evans, Price, and Parrish on the field in a spread formation offense with Lynch as the single back. I would run Evans on a fly, Price on a Post, and Parrish on a slant. TE stays in to block JP's backside. I would then fake a handoff to Lynch, pump fake to the slant route, and throw the ball deep to Evans.

    - 2nd offensive play, regardless of what happened on 1st down. I would Run out of the same formation to the strong side of our offensive line using the TE to double down on DE or strongside backer.

    - 3rd offensive play, bring in fullback, and remove Price. Quick slant to Parrish

    What we've just done is show the D that we aren't afraid to throw it deep out of a spread formation. Then we proved that we aren't afraid to run from the same formation... making them realize that we can do either from the same formation. Then we show that while we are in a running formation with the I back set, we will pass out of it on a quick slant.

    We've just loosened up the defense! If that hasn't worked... you do it again and again until you get 7 guys in the box, the 2 safeties are making their first step backwards, instead of forwards.

    Now you mix in a few RB screens. A single reverse to keep the DE's honest. And throw it deep (40+ yards) at least once per quarter on 1st or 2nd down.

    Anyone want to sign me to a coaching contract?
  • raphael120
    Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
    • Oct 2005
    • 5152

    #2
    Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

    I saw the same exact things, we are very predictable if you just look at who our personel on the field is, most of the time it will dictate what we will do. Our best players are NOT on the field in critical situations, this is for both offense and defense. If our DE's are getting that much money, tell them to ****in suck it up and be in there on critical downs! And don't have them pass rush every damn play! When they do that they get blown out wide of the play and are nutralized for both pass and run plays, it's just mind boggling the incompetance in this organization! We're paying tons of money for this talent that is only on the field HALF the snaps! We're too light on our players, Schobel should be in on every 3rd down play, all of our best players should be. Lynch should be in on every 3rd down play, A.Train should never hit the field, he has yet to produce a posivite play. Where's Wright in this mess???

    Where's Fred Jackson!?!?

    Comment

    • Jaybird
      Registered User
      • Dec 2005
      • 1908

      #3
      Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

      i agree my man, ive been calling a lot of plays also. Losman needs 30 passes a game. then he looks good

      Comment

      • LtBillsFan66
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 35553

        #4
        Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

        Originally posted by Jaybird
        i agree my man, ive been calling a lot of plays also. Losman needs 30 passes a game. then he looks good
        Kind of hard to get 30 if he can't complete the ones he's given.

        Comment

        • raphael120
          Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
          • Oct 2005
          • 5152

          #5
          Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

          Originally posted by Jaybird
          i agree my man, ive been calling a lot of plays also. Losman needs 30 passes a game. then he looks good
          Well they can't get that many passes when they only have 9 possessions all game long and they all go for 3 and out.

          Comment

          • OpIv37
            Acid Douching Asswipe
            • Sep 2002
            • 101275

            #6
            Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

            Some people want to blame Losman. Some people want to blame Fairchild. The truth is that it's both. Losman is held back by the play calling, but that doesn't excuse him for holding the ball too long and missing open receivers. It's not Fairchild's fault that Losman can't make a good throw, but the personnel and the predictability are his fault and that only makes Losman's job more difficult.
            MiKiDo Facebook
            MiKiDo Website

            Comment

            • LtBillsFan66
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 35553

              #7
              Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

              Exactly. The playcalling looks bad when JP throws screen passes in the dirt or 10 feet too high.

              Comment

              • mchurchfie
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 13418

                #8
                Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                That's right, you have to earn those extra passes.
                My Band
                daveviterna.com



                Comment

                • Elminster
                  #1 Kelsay Fan
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 928

                  #9
                  Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                  You MUST attack the defense to be a good team in this league. You must make every attempt to confuse the defense, to make them hesitate but a MOMENT. That is all it takes in this league....a blink of the eye's worth of hesitation to give up a big play. To lose, all you have to do is be predictable and vanilla. We seem to have taken the easy way out. Last year showed me that Losman is, believe or not, capable of throwing good passes. And he hopefully still is....but we really haven't even given him much of a chance. Our receivers outside Lee are somewhat of a weakness which we seem intent on compounding by using predictable play-calling and not having guys go out. In fact, it seems on almost every pass play, the TE and the back stay in to pass-block. And, half the time, we STILL can't pick-up a blitz. DJ is smoking something good if he thinks the line is fine if it routinely needs that much help to pick up one or two blitzers. Losman DOES hold it too long sometimes. but I really am not sure how much he does it since the routes that take all day to develop and a receiver getting open seems somewhat of a rare occurrence. This isn't just about an effective game-plan, but also effectively evaluating JP.

                  When I saw the Redskins play, I saw their offensive line handle seven blitzers on their lonesome. I saw running backs in blitz protection, in the flat, and sometimes even doing both in one play. I saw a variety of formations, none of which gave the defense a clue as to what was going to happen on that particular play! I saw receivers run all different sorts of routes, even from the same formation. I saw them rolling out their QB, saw him staying in the pocket sometimes...they did ALOT. I'm not suggesting we create a 600-play playbook, but Losman and Campbell are similar in terms of skill-set...why do the Redskins take advantage of it but we seem intent on ignoring it? It is simply maddening to me that we refuse to take advantage of our personnel, and then get to hear that's not a problem!
                  Good riddance Fairchild. Of course, the knowledge of your departure will only make TE more hateable than the typical Bills QB. Good luck, hope we don't mess you up like JP.

                  Comment

                  • Wraith
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 280

                    #10
                    Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                    Originally posted by billsfanone
                    Exactly. The playcalling looks bad when JP throws screen passes in the dirt or 10 feet too high.
                    Okay, that explains one play, what about the other 99% of them?

                    Comment

                    • Wraith
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 280

                      #11
                      Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                      Originally posted by billsfanone
                      Kind of hard to get 30 if he can't complete the ones he's given.
                      He's completed 63% of his passes. "Can't complete." Bull****. You can't argue that he's not completing passes.

                      Comment

                      • mchurchfie
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 13418

                        #12
                        Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                        Originally posted by Elminster
                        When I saw the Redskins play, I saw their offensive line handle seven blitzers on their lonesome. I saw running backs in blitz protection, in the flat, and sometimes even doing both in one play. I saw a variety of formations, none of which gave the defense a clue as to what was going to happen on that particular play! I saw receivers run all different sorts of routes, even from the same formation. I saw them rolling out their QB, saw him staying in the pocket sometimes...they did ALOT. I'm not suggesting we create a 600-play playbook, but Losman and Campbell are similar in terms of skill-set...why do the Redskins take advantage of it but we seem intent on ignoring it? It is simply maddening to me that we refuse to take advantage of our personnel, and then get to hear that's not a problem!
                        No comparison other than physical skills. Campbell looked miles ahead of JP the other night. Talk about grabbing an opportunity and running with it. They have a good young QB for the next decade.
                        My Band
                        daveviterna.com



                        Comment

                        • mchurchfie
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 13418

                          #13
                          Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                          Originally posted by Wraith
                          He's completed 63% of his passes. "Can't complete." Bull****. You can't argue that he's not completing passes.
                          He's missing the most important ones. Alot of his completions came after the fact.
                          My Band
                          daveviterna.com



                          Comment

                          • LtBillsFan66
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 35553

                            #14
                            Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                            Originally posted by mchurchfie
                            He's missing the most important ones. Alot of his completions came after the fact.
                            Garbage time. When the other team is playing prevent D.

                            Comment

                            • TacklingDummy
                              Unreachable Douche
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 71725

                              #15
                              Re: I don't think Fairchild is getting enough blame.

                              Originally posted by Wraith
                              He's completed 63% of his passes. "Can't complete." Bull****. You can't argue that he's not completing passes.
                              Kelly Holcomb had a high completion % also.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X