Would you rather have....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mahdi
    Registered User
    • Mar 2004
    • 10585

    Would you rather have....

    Marshawn Lynch, Adrian Peterson or Reggie Bush? Why?



    Ill say Lynch because I think he is the total package. He has as much power as Peterson and is more ellusive than Bush. He is a better receiver than Peterson also. Bush is clearly the best receiver of them all.

    Lynch is my pick.
  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101288

    #2
    Re: Would you rather have....

    I'd take Lynch over Bush because I like Lynch's size and power better. He's not as good at receiving as Bush but he's still good enough to be a threat.

    I've never really seen Peterson play a full game- just highlights- so I don't know if I'd put him ahead of Lynch or not.
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website

    Comment

    • PECKERWOOD
      Defies all logic
      • Oct 2006
      • 13170

      #3
      Re: Would you rather have....

      I'll take Lynch because I have no loyalty towards the others.

      Comment

      • Mitchy moo
        Roways rooking ahread!
        • Sep 2005
        • 18380

        #4
        Re: Would you rather have....

        Lynch = Heart & Game. When you see those come together you know you have someone special.

        Comment

        • BILLSROCK1212
          !?!?!?!?!?
          • Mar 2006
          • 5269

          #5
          Re: Would you rather have....

          I'd rank them like this....
          1. Lynch
          2. Bush
          3. Peterson (injury risk)

          Comment

          • Mahdi
            Registered User
            • Mar 2004
            • 10585

            #6
            Re: Would you rather have....

            Originally posted by BILLSROCK1212
            I'd rank them like this....
            1. Lynch
            2. Bush
            3. Peterson (injury risk)
            Despite the injury risk I think I would still rank Peterson ahead of Bush because of his superior running ability. Bush needs to run between the tackles first.

            Comment

            • SABURZFAN
              short bus extraordinaire
              • Jul 2002
              • 50747

              #7
              Re: Would you rather have....

              i smell disaster with this thread.anybody who doesn't say Lynch first is not a Bills fans,etc.....the bantering will continue and before you know it,the Mods are closing threads to anybody who talks bad about Lynch.
              Originally posted by yordad
              Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

              Comment

              • Jan Reimers
                Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                • May 2003
                • 17353

                #8
                Re: Would you rather have....

                I love the way Lynch just scratches and claws for every yard. Don't know if the others have that kind of heart and desire.
                Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                Comment

                • Mahdi
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 10585

                  #9
                  Re: Would you rather have....

                  Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                  I love the way Lynch just scratches and claws for every yard. Don't know if the others have that kind of heart and desire.
                  Yeah he really surprised me with all that power. Wasnt expecting him to be that strong.

                  Comment

                  • Mitchy moo
                    Roways rooking ahread!
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 18380

                    #10
                    Re: Would you rather have....

                    Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                    I love the way Lynch just scratches and claws for every yard. Don't know if the others have that kind of heart and desire.
                    That cannot be taught, it has to come from inside. This guy will get us the first down without his helmet on in a snowstorm if he has to.

                    Comment

                    • Mr. Pink
                      Peterman Sucks!
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 35303

                      #11
                      Re: Would you rather have....

                      Right now I'd take Reggie Bush. He has shown that he can hold up through an NFL season and play at a high level. While I don't think he's gonna be a strict RB at any point in his career, to me he seems to be an Eric Metcalf clone and will probably be switched off to WR before his career is over...he still has more game experience than the other two.

                      Now, after this season, that could definitely change...but as of today it's Bush-Peterson-Lynch based on what they have done on the field.

                      I still think Peterson if he can hold up and not get hurt has the potential to be easily the best of the three. With Lynch being second and then Bush third..as far as RB production goes.

                      Comment

                      • patmoran2006
                        Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 19840

                        #12
                        Re: Would you rather have....

                        Originally posted by Mahdi
                        Marshawn Lynch, Adrian Peterson or Reggie Bush? Why?



                        Ill say Lynch because I think he is the total package. He has as much power as Peterson and is more ellusive than Bush. He is a better receiver than Peterson also. Bush is clearly the best receiver of them all.

                        Lynch is my pick.
                        aint nobody more elusive than Bush, certainly not Lynch or AP.

                        Put it this way, I'd be happy with any of the three. They all bring something different to the table.

                        But for right now? I'd take Bush in a second. Then again, it depends what kind of offense you're running. Certain offenses would favor the other guys.

                        I will say this. Give him a ****ing line that block with the run and Lynch is going to be VERY special.


                        Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                        Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                        Comment

                        • Ickybaluky
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 8884

                          #13
                          Re: Would you rather have....

                          Bush is a great receiver, but he dances too much when running with the ball.

                          Give me Peterson. The kid is electric, a threat to go the distance each time he touches the ball. Despite playing in an offense that has no passing game, he has averaged for 4.3 YPC, 281 total yards and a TD in two games. He is going to be a great player.

                          Comment

                          • Bling
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 13022

                            #14
                            Re: Would you rather have....

                            AD first, Lynch second, Bush third. I prefer pure runners.

                            Comment

                            • gr8slayer
                              Registered User
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 20796

                              #15
                              Re: Would you rather have....

                              I've been saying it since before the draft. Marshawn Lynch is the best back in this years draft....... Marshawn Jones-Drew Faulk baby!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X