View Full Version : why not jamal anderson?
Tatonka
03-24-2003, 10:38 PM
if we are going to look at gary, mine as well call jamal anderson as well.
SoCalBillsFan
03-24-2003, 10:41 PM
id take either at a cheap price and as a backup..why not?
MiamiMasterpiece
03-24-2003, 11:35 PM
They will both most certainly be cheap. Does Anderson plan on returning?
The Spaz
03-25-2003, 02:42 AM
There's a reason he didn't sign with NE, his knee is still f'd up! Go Bills!
The_Philster
03-25-2003, 04:42 AM
Injury concerns and the price he'd be asking for are why not.
BillsFanInMass
03-25-2003, 06:49 AM
i would rather sign gary he has so much more upside
Herdwatcher
03-25-2003, 08:40 AM
The funky chicken, or looney bird or what ever, is a fat bird right now. Looks like any physical workout has been the farthest thing on his mind. Or was it the dirty bird?
Mr. Miyagi
03-25-2003, 08:51 AM
Why not Jamal Anderson?
Because he's broken.
Tatonka
03-25-2003, 11:06 AM
i have nothing to add to this..lol..
i just wanted to see what the sentament was...
i always like the guy.
TedMock
03-25-2003, 11:17 AM
isn't Gary smaller and faster? I personally think that's what we need. I've always been a big fan of the "change of pace" back.
Throne Logic
03-25-2003, 11:57 AM
Jamal made the decision that he wanted another year off to rehab. It was his choice not to sign with the Pats last year. He's been working out all off-season and will only return if he feels he could be back close to where he was before. In the "informal" interview I saw, he seemed to think he was ready.
Why not bring him in for a workout?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.