If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Besides the Prevent curl up and die D in the last few series that was called by the coaches, we had a great showing. I mean my god, we traumatized Romo all night and forced the QB into bad decisions. What more could you ask for then that??
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
I don't think that D will work against everybody, well for instance lets say marsha Brady.
In the end, there are only three liberal archetypes: The fools, the beneficiaries and the crooks.
"If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day, but if you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life"
Optyimus Ignorus Realityious!
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty. - John F. Kennedy, January 20, 1961
To live in the presence of great truths and eternal laws,
to be led by permanent ideals -
that is what keeps a man patient
when the world ignores him,
and calm and unspoiled when the world praises him. -- Honore De Balzac
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Originally posted by Skooby
Besides the Prevent curl up and die D in the last few series that was called by the coaches, we had a great showing. I mean my god, we traumatized Romo all night and forced the QB into bad decisions. What more could you ask for then that?
Perhaps, once in a great while, a little pressure on the QB?
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Originally posted by Jan Reimers
Perhaps, once in a great while, a little pressure on the QB?
If we're tipping balls and getting pick 6's (2) how much more do we want?? A little better plan at the end would of been nice but that wasn't the player's fault.
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
I hope they use that Creep defense more often. The reason it was effective is because Dallas didnt want to run on it so the pass became predictable giving our speedy Defense a chance to make plays. It also made Romo worry about where pressure was coming from.
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Maybe cause when it truly mattered they walked down the feild 3 times and won the game, no pressure on the QB, soft zone coverage that allowed an 80yd drive, u gotta remember too that some of those INTs were just bad throws by Romo not the scheme fooling him, Wilson, Digorgio, Kelsay, Greer and Crowell picks were very good plays by the D, plus u gotta remember what the other 4 teams did to us that we played already we were ranked 32 in the league remember?
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Originally posted by Mahdi
I hope they use that Creep defense more often. The reason it was effective is because Dallas didnt want to run on it so the pass became predictable giving our speedy Defense a chance to make plays. It also made Romo worry about where pressure was coming from.
I definitely like the creep D. I've seen NE run it with success too.
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
That defense works wonders for the Pittsburgh Steelers and it's why they are always a top 15 D. They have those complex looks and blitz schemes, you have no idea where the blitzer is coming from or if theyre even blizting at all. Cept for us, we have faster personnel which means we can go from faking a blitz to getting back in coverage so much faster than the Steelers. I remember the Steelers game vs. Indy where the Steelers D was knockin Manning on his ass all day long and he was so frustrated and Manning fell out of his element. It's what we did to Romo. If our defense could do as well in that scheme as we did then, even half as well as we did, and get our offense actually rolling, we could be a dangerous team. I shudder at the thought of how bad we wouldve beat the Cowboys if we had an offense that scored. 50-17 is a very conservative score.
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Originally posted by raphael120
That defense works wonders for the Pittsburgh Steelers and it's why they are always a top 15 D. They have those complex looks and blitz schemes, you have no idea where the blitzer is coming from or if theyre even blizting at all. Cept for us, we have faster personnel which means we can go from faking a blitz to getting back in coverage so much faster than the Steelers. I remember the Steelers game vs. Indy where the Steelers D was knockin Manning on his ass all day long and he was so frustrated and Manning fell out of his element. It's what we did to Romo. If our defense could do as well in that scheme as we did then, even half as well as we did, and get our offense actually rolling, we could be a dangerous team. I shudder at the thought of how bad we wouldve beat the Cowboys if we had an offense that scored. 50-17 is a very conservative score.
Ill be real mad if I dont see that defense used on a consistent basis. It stops the run and confuses the pass. Fewell better stick to his guns.
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
Originally posted by Skooby
If we're tipping balls and getting pick 6's (2) how much more do we want?? A little better plan at the end would of been nice but that wasn't the player's fault.
Oh, an occasional sack would be nice.
Our DEs aren't playing badly - and Kelsay's tip and interception were great - but doesn't the job description for DEs still include sacks?
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Re: Why would we change anything about the defense we had last week
I do agree that credit is deserved for the coaches for getting the team to stand up like they did against the Dboys. 6 turnovers when we've had like 4 all year wasn't a fluke, it was gameplanning.
Tweet
, Good point but turnovers and points from the D never hurt the old scoreboard.
Comment