Okay, this is nit-picky...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MikeInRoch
    Registered User
    • Sep 2003
    • 10446

    Okay, this is nit-picky...

    The O only actually got the ball on *4* turnovers.

    3 points off of them still sucks.
    "'Clean up your room.', 'Stand up straight.', 'Pick up your feet.', 'Take it like a man.', 'Be nice to your sister.', 'Don't mix beer and wine, ever.'. Oh yeah, 'Don't drive on the railroad track.'"

    "Eh, Phil. That's one I happen to agree with."
  • ParanoidAndroid
    My battery is low and it's getting dark.
    • Apr 2004
    • 16862

    #2
    Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

    Actually, the Bills' offense scored zero points off of turnovers. The lone field goal came after a Dallas kickoff. The drive was nice, lasting 8:43 but a TD would have made it great.

    Comment

    • TacklingDummy
      Unreachable Douche
      • Jul 2002
      • 71727

      #3
      Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

      Recovering the onside kick would have been even better.
      Last edited by TacklingDummy; 10-13-2007, 10:45 AM.

      Comment

      • Michael82
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 82328

        #4
        Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

        Originally posted by TacklingDummy
        Recovering the onside would have been even better.
        If Coy Wire was in there, our special teams captain, I bet we would have recoved the onside kick.

        Comment

        • TheGhostofJimKelly
          Registered User
          • May 2003
          • 12459

          #5
          Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

          Originally posted by andyxc71
          Actually, the Bills' offense scored zero points off of turnovers. The lone field goal came after a Dallas kickoff. The drive was nice, lasting 8:43 but a TD would have made it great.

          Right, Lindell missed a field goal that was the result of an interception.

          Comment

          • acehole
            Registered User
            • Jan 2006
            • 4877

            #6
            Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

            Originally posted by andyxc71
            Actually, the Bills' offense scored zero points off of turnovers. The lone field goal came after a Dallas kickoff. The drive was nice, lasting 8:43 but a TD would have made it great.
            Yes I can't believe that JP Losman has to go.......err wait he wasnt playing.


            Who was at qb again?...Oh Yea.
            Hated by the stupid..
            Loved by their moms.

            Comment

            • YardRat
              Well, lookie here...
              • Dec 2004
              • 86322

              #7
              Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

              The only significant difference, at this point, between having Edwards or Losman under center has been the ability to sustain drives slightly better, and a marked improvement in time of possession. That's a step in the right direction, IMO, and the points will come.
              YardRat Wall of Fame
              #56 DARRYL TALLEY
              #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

              Comment

              • camelcowboy
                Registered User
                • Mar 2005
                • 7449

                #8
                Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                Originally posted by Mikey82
                If Coy Wire was in there, our special teams captain, I bet we would have recoved the onside kick.
                I think losman should play special teams


                Comment

                • G. Host
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 10298

                  #9
                  Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                  Originally posted by Mikey82
                  If Coy Wire was in there, our special teams captain, I bet we would have recoved the onside kick.
                  I think the injuries in general have hurt special teams. Whether Wire would have recovered it depends on what position he was in at time but it was a strange lineup for a possible onside kick.

                  Comment

                  • ParanoidAndroid
                    My battery is low and it's getting dark.
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 16862

                    #10
                    Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                    Originally posted by YardRat
                    The only significant difference, at this point, between having Edwards or Losman under center has been the ability to sustain drives slightly better, and a marked improvement in time of possession. That's a step in the right direction, IMO, and the points will come.
                    A nearly 9-minute drive against a good defense...? You might be able to say that. He throws for first downs when we need it. Losman has trouble finding receivers on 3rd down.

                    Comment

                    • Jan Reimers
                      Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                      • May 2003
                      • 17353

                      #11
                      Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                      Neither Losman nor Edwards has put many points on the board so far this season.

                      I think the QB race is still wide open.
                      Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                      Comment

                      • DraftBoy
                        Administrator
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 107443

                        #12
                        Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                        I think we'll be brining in a developmental prospect (like a Josh Johnson, Ricky Santos) to sit for a year or two and see if Edwards or Losman can do anything consistently and win us games.
                        COMING SOON...
                        Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                        We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                        Comment

                        • SABURZFAN
                          short bus extraordinaire
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 50747

                          #13
                          Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                          Originally posted by MikeInRoch
                          The O only actually got the ball on *4* turnovers.

                          3 points off of them still sucks.


                          any way you look at it,it stills stinks.
                          Originally posted by yordad
                          Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

                          Comment

                          • jamze132
                            Don’t hate…
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 29417

                            #14
                            Re: Okay, this is nit-picky...

                            Fairchild is the root of the problem, not JP, Trent, or Craig.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X