McCargo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kerr
    Hall of Fame Zoner
    • Feb 2005
    • 6656

    McCargo

    Per PFW:

    A foot ailment sidelined Bills DT John McCargo for most of his rookie season, but we hear the team is very pleased with the 2006 first-rounder’s performance thus far. Although technically not starting, he’s been the defense’s most consistent performer.


    So my question is then why isn't McCargo starting? Isn't McCargo Tripps backup? If memory serves correct, Larry Tripplet always was a better pass rusher than run defender.
  • bigbub2352
    Registered User
    • Feb 2005
    • 5386

    #2
    Re: McCargo

    Triplett sadly, has not performed at all here, he was known as a pass rushing DT, but i think he only has 1 sack since we signed him, technically McCargo is the backup but i have seen him playing next to Larry and Kyle too, so i think with the heavey rotation that Perry Fewell has technically we have 4 starters on the DT situation, but i believe that John should be gettin more snaps, he has been the most disruptive, and Kyle has shown flashes
    XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

    Comment

    • EDS
      Registered User
      • Jan 2003
      • 5216

      #3
      Re: McCargo

      If I am the Bills I would consider experimenting with Triplett at end.

      Comment

      • THATHURMANATOR
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 69112

        #4
        Re: McCargo

        Originally posted by EDS
        If I am the Bills I would consider experimenting with Triplett at end.
        Why? We have 4 ends that are surely better than he would be.

        Comment

        • mysticsoto
          Too sober for this...
          • Apr 2004
          • 31439

          #5
          Re: McCargo

          Originally posted by EDS
          If I am the Bills I would consider experimenting with Triplett at end.
          Why? Tripplett isn't that fast...

          With our rash of injuries, I was going to suggest that they should try Schobel at LB (even though he'd likely be too slow) but thankfully, Ellison has returned and this week we get Coy Wire back who was playing well at LB before getting hurt.

          McCargo not starting is no big deal since with the rotational scheme, all of them get ample time to play.

          Comment

          • THATHURMANATOR
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 69112

            #6
            Re: McCargo

            Keep everyone where they are. Honestly aside from POZ and Ko Simpson we should be pretty healthy on D this Sunday.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: McCargo

              Originally posted by bigbub2352
              Triplett sadly, has not performed at all here, he was known as a pass rushing DT, but i think he only has 1 sack since we signed him, technically McCargo is the backup but i have seen him playing next to Larry and Kyle too, so i think with the heavey rotation that Perry Fewell has technically we have 4 starters on the DT situation, but i believe that John should be gettin more snaps, he has been the most disruptive, and Kyle has shown flashes
              Tripplett never played well in Indy either. Horrible signing at the expense.

              McCargo hasn't done squat. The fact that anyone in Buffalo may be happy with his play is more a testimony to the continued low expectations and satisfactions with this losing organization than it is of anything else, particularly anything positive.

              What's next, talk about how Greer is the best DB. Boy howdy!

              Comment

              • Tatonka
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 21289

                #8
                Re: McCargo

                i have been very happy with the play of the Dline in general the last 2 games.
                "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

                Comment

                • camelcowboy
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 7449

                  #9
                  Re: McCargo

                  Originally posted by Wys Guy
                  Tripplett never played well in Indy either. Horrible signing at the expense.

                  McCargo hasn't done squat. The fact that anyone in Buffalo may be happy with his play is more a testimony to the continued low expectations and satisfactions with this losing organization than it is of anything else, particularly anything positive.

                  What's next, talk about how Greer is the best DB. Boy howdy!
                  McCargo was dominate monday night, he is their best d-tackle.


                  Comment

                  • PECKERWOOD
                    Defies all logic
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 13170

                    #10
                    Re: McCargo

                    I want us to ease McCargo into the starting role. It's nice to see him playing well because I was really down on him before the regular season started. Hopefully his success continues and the injury bug doesn't find him again.

                    Comment

                    • Mahdi
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 10585

                      #11
                      Re: McCargo

                      Originally posted by EDS
                      If I am the Bills I would consider experimenting with Triplett at end.
                      Not a bad idea on 1st down.

                      Comment

                      • Mahdi
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 10585

                        #12
                        Re: McCargo

                        Originally posted by Wys Guy
                        Tripplett never played well in Indy either. Horrible signing at the expense.

                        McCargo hasn't done squat. The fact that anyone in Buffalo may be happy with his play is more a testimony to the continued low expectations and satisfactions with this losing organization than it is of anything else, particularly anything positive.

                        What's next, talk about how Greer is the best DB. Boy howdy!
                        Yer negativity is non-sensical. Yer obviously here just to ruffle some feathers.

                        Comment

                        • Kerr
                          Hall of Fame Zoner
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 6656

                          #13
                          Re: McCargo

                          Originally posted by Wys Guy
                          Tripplett never played well in Indy either. Horrible signing at the expense.

                          McCargo hasn't done squat. The fact that anyone in Buffalo may be happy with his play is more a testimony to the continued low expectations and satisfactions with this losing organization than it is of anything else, particularly anything positive.

                          What's next, talk about how Greer is the best DB. Boy howdy!

                          Tripplet was a decent pass rusher in Indy. It seems he's still developing as a run defender.

                          McCargo has been seen in the backfield at times disrupting plays.

                          Greer just might be the best corner on this team. He played pretty well against two of the top receivers in the league.

                          Comment

                          • Forward_Lateral
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 29897

                            #14
                            Re: McCargo

                            Who cares who starts on the D-line, or any position for that matter. It's who's on the field in crucial situations that matters. McCArgo would see the same amount of playing time as a starter as he does at backup. The whole idea is to keep the big guy fresh, and I'm sure they are being a bit cautious with him, because of the nature of his past foot injuries.

                            Comment

                            • OpIv37
                              Acid Douching Asswipe
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 101255

                              #15
                              Re: McCargo

                              Originally posted by Forward_Lateral
                              Who cares who starts on the D-line, or any position for that matter. It's who's on the field in crucial situations that matters. McCArgo would see the same amount of playing time as a starter as he does at backup. The whole idea is to keep the big guy fresh, and I'm sure they are being a bit cautious with him, because of the nature of his past foot injuries.
                              if the guy is missing playing time or important plays because they're afraid he might get hurt, what good is he? Either he's on the bench because he's injured or he's on the bench because they're trying to keep him from getting injured, but either way he's not on the field. I'd rather take the risk of an injury than the risk of having Anderson and Jefferson in at DT at the same time.
                              MiKiDo Facebook
                              MiKiDo Website

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X