Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

[Don't Panic]

http://www.realfootball365.com/nfl/articles/19971.html

Buffalo spent a king's ransom on its offensive line in the offseason and doing so has panned out decently in pass protection; however, the run blocking simply hasn't been there. When Lynch has run to the left behind the Bills' much-ballyhooed left side of tackle Jason Peters and $49 million guard Derrick Dockery, lanes haven't always been there. When he's run to the middle behind center Melvin Fowler or to the right behind guard Brad Butler and $25 million tackle Langston Walker, there hasn't consistently been a sizable hole.
That's the reason why Lynch, despite all his skills, hasn't amassed a 100-yard game this season. Instead, he's been forced to settle for contests of 90, 64, 74, 79, 66 and 84 yards. Those numbers are far from terrible, especially against the elite run defenses -- Pittsburgh, New England, Dallas and Baltimore -- the Bills have faced, but you'd like to see more production given that they spent so much to revamp their upfront blocking.
Most troubling is the line's lack of push on short-yardage plays, which was a big problem during the McGahee era. Take a small sample from Buffalo's win over the Ravens, for instance. In the fourth quarter, when the Bills were trying to run the block out and keep Baltimore's offense away from the field, Lynch was handed the ball nine times. How many yards did he accumulate, you ask? A whopping 11. First downs gained? Zero.

This was something I heard a lot of the faithful complain about at the game on Sunday. Lynch's avg. is pretty low and the kid does run with power every time. Admittedly, he will eventually do a better job of reading and reacting, but it seems to me like there should be a little more real estate for him to navigate. This isn't something I'm good at diagnosing though, so I can't say for certain who is to blame. All I can say is that a runner like Lynch should be getting 4.5 per carry. If we were running the ball better late, we'd be talking about victories over Dallas and Denver, not bitter defeats.

[EDS]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

Run blocking is definitely a huge problem. Hopefully it will get better as the line plays together more because I don't see the team spending any additional money on the offensive line in the near future given the sizable contracts already awarded.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

Gee, i argued this very point yesterday with people on here, I have said all along, Melvin Fowler, Brad Butler and Mike ooops Langston are not getting push on the run blocking plays at all, and when the Bills choose to run to the left, backside pursuit is what is gettin Lynch from behind, the onyl free pass should go to Butler, cause he is still developing, and only has played guard for 6 games, he was hurt all preseason except the the last game against detroit, he can and hopefully will get better,
i am glad i am not the only one who sees it

[Pride]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I also believe that until a defense believes a Bills QB can beat them through the air... they will continue to play to stop the run first, pass second.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I think we have to spend a day one pick on an LT next year. Move Peters to RT, Walker to RG, and maybe even replace Fowler with an improvement via FA. That would solve our problem pretty nicely.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

It may have to do with our inability to get defenses to respect the deep ball. They are stacking the line.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

It may have to do with our inability to get defenses to respect the deep ball. They are stacking the line.

That's a decent point, but don't you think that there should be a little more space for Lynch to operate in from time to time. I don't expect the Grand Canyon every play, but if you give Lynch a little room to move, he will break one off. I haven't seen him do that in a while.... or at least not at the frequency that I expect.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I think our lack of passing attack contributes to this as well, but Fowler is not the answer at C i think if he is replaced next year our line comes together that much more, we need to open up the offense this week against a strugglin Jets team, shopw what we can do, stop being so conservative with the short and intermidiate routes

[Mahdi]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I have been very critical of the run blocking lately. However I spent some time watching the tapes of the last couple games and its quite clear why we cant run. When teams want to stop their opponents from running they usually set an 8 man box. Watching the Dallas game again a lot of the time they had a 9 man box. I dont care how big or good your OL is, no one is going to find running room with 9 in the box, on a coulpe of plays i even counted 10. The thing is most of our completions happen within 10 yards of the LOS, so why would the defense be any farther back than that. Trent is going to have to make some plays to back defenses off or Lynch's average will be about the same even against the Jets.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I have been very critical of the run blocking lately. However I spent some time watching the tapes of the last couple games and its quite clear why we cant run. When teams want to stop their opponents from running they usually set an 8 man box. Watching the Dallas game again a lot of the time they had a 9 man box. I dont care how big or good your OL is, no one is going to find running room with 9 in the box, on a coulpe of plays i even counted 10. The thing is most of our completions happen within 10 yards of the LOS, so why would the defense be any farther back than that. Trent is going to have to make some plays to back defenses off or Lynch's average will be about the same even against the Jets.

I rewatched the ravens game, i had it on the aDVR per your suggestion, and i do agree with you 100% that they are not respecting the pass and stacking the line, almost every play, but it should be the coaches recognizing that and calling for that famous playaction, or run a screen when they are obvioulsy blitzing, also they should give the freedom to Trent to audible out if he sees them stack up, i never understood why JP and Trent were not allowed or dont audible, just hope that this is the reason and we didnt overspend on a Mike Williams clone

[Mahdi]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

I rewatched the ravens game, i had it on the aDVR per your suggestion, and i do agree with you 100% that they are not respecting the pass and stacking the line, almost every play, but it should be the coaches recognizing that and calling for that famous playaction, or run a screen when they are obvioulsy blitzing, also they should give the freedom to Trent to audible out if he sees them stack up, i never understood why JP and Trent were not allowed or dont audible, just hope that this is the reason and we didnt overspend on a Mike Williams clone

It must be the reason. I mean you can only block one guy at a time and if 2 are already there the play is dead. Normally, in zone blocking you block one guy then release to the second level. But if they are already all there there is no second level. Its all one level which is what Lynch faces every down. 3.6 ypc is impressive.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

If we throw deep once every two possessions, even if it's incomplete, we'll keep them honest. No one can handle 10 in the box, but they shouldn't have to. Fairchild has to see that progression and make them pay for it.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

If we throw deep once every two possessions, even if it's incomplete, we'll keep them honest. No one can handle 10 in the box, but they shouldn't have to. Fairchild has to see that progression and make them pay for it.

Exactly, thats what i have been yelling, lol, Fairchild needs to recognize what the Defense is doing and attack it, PLAYACTION on a stacked box

[gr8slayer]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

One issue is the freaking play-calling. The coaches start the game running the ball often, then in the second half (when you MUST dominate the clock) they get away from it. This Mikey Mouse **** doesn't cut it. Lynch, like most RB's get better as they get more carries, give the man the rock DICK! If he's not getting the ball 25-30 times a game it should be considered a crime.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Buffalo's run blocking cause for concern

Exactly, thats what i have been yelling, lol, Fairchild needs to recognize what the Defense is doing and attack it, PLAYACTION on a stacked box

I can't tell you how many times I was screaming for play-action from the stands on our multitude of 2nd and shorts on Sunday.