PDA

View Full Version : Tom Brady's first season



ghz in pittsburgh
10-24-2007, 09:08 PM
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| WK OPP | CMP ATT PYD TD INT | RSH YD TD |
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| 2 nyj (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nyj2001.htm) | 5 10 46 0 0 | 1 9 0 |
| 3 ind (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt2001.htm) | 13 23 168 0 0 | 1 2 0 |
| 4 mia (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/mia2001.htm) | 12 24 86 0 0 | 2 9 0 |
| 5 sdg (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sdg2001.htm) | 33 54 364 2 0 | 1 0 0 |
| 6 ind (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt2001.htm) | 16 20 202 3 0 | 2 -2 0 |
| 7 den (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/den2001.htm) | 25 38 203 2 4 | 2 -1 0 |
| 8 atl (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/atl2001.htm) | 21 31 250 3 0 | 3 0 0 |
| 9 buf (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf2001.htm) | 15 21 107 1 1 | 4 -1 0 |
| 10 stl (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram2001.htm) | 19 27 185 1 2 | 2 6 0 |
| 11 nor (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nor2001.htm) | 19 26 258 4 0 | 4 14 0 |
| 12 nyj (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nyj2001.htm) | 20 28 213 0 0 | 3 0 0 |
| 13 cle (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle2001.htm) | 19 28 218 0 2 | 4 -3 0 |
| 14 buf (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf2001.htm) | 19 35 237 0 1 | 3 13 0 |
| 15 mia (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/mia2001.htm) | 11 19 108 1 0 | 3 -5 0 |
| 17 car (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car2001.htm) | 17 29 198 1 2 | 1 2 0 |
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| TOTAL | 264 413 2843 18 12 | 36 43 0
|+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
</PRE>

By no means I equate Edwards to Brady. Just a little pespective on even the greatest QB today started out a little slow. And he already had a year on Edwards in terms of experience. I'm troubled by Edwards INTs, something Brady always seemed to avoid at crucial times. Then again Edwards is a true rookie, he didn't get a chance to sit and watch. By comparison, even the great Peyton Manning had more INTs than TDs in his rookie season.
</PRE>


</PRE>

The biggest attribute of Brady is his improvement, even after winning 1st superbowl. We can only hope Edwards improves as he plays.
</PRE>

Tatonka
10-24-2007, 09:37 PM
dont even put the god of all qbs in the same post at mr. .25td/1int per game.

camelcowboy
10-24-2007, 09:49 PM
<TABLE class=w655px cellSpacing=0 _extended="true"><TBODY _extended="true"><TR class=whiteback _extended="true"><TD _extended="true">3</TD><TD _extended="true">09/23 </TD><TD _extended="true">@ NE (http://www.nfl.com/teams/profile?team=NE)</TD><TD _extended="true">L 7-38 (http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=29231&displayPage=tab_gamecenter&season=2007&seasonType=REG&week=3)</TD></TD _extended="true"><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">10</TD><TD _extended="true">20</TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">97</TD><TD _extended="true">4.9</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">9</TD><TD _extended="true">43.1</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">0.0</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD></TR><TR class=ltblueback _extended="true"><TD _extended="true">4</TD><TD _extended="true">09/30 </TD><TD _extended="true">NYJ (http://www.nfl.com/teams/profile?team=NYJ)</TD><TD _extended="true">W 17-14 (http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=29244&displayPage=tab_gamecenter&season=2007&seasonType=REG&week=4)</TD></TD _extended="true"><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">22</TD><TD _extended="true">28</TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">234</TD><TD _extended="true">8.4</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">2</TD><TD _extended="true">16</TD><TD _extended="true">98.5</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">-1</TD><TD _extended="true">-1.0</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD></TR><TR class=whiteback _extended="true"><TD _extended="true">5</TD><TD _extended="true">10/08 </TD><TD _extended="true">DAL (http://www.nfl.com/teams/profile?team=DAL)</TD><TD _extended="true">L 24-25 (http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=29270&displayPage=tab_gamecenter&season=2007&seasonType=REG&week=5)</TD></TD _extended="true"><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">23</TD><TD _extended="true">31</TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">176</TD><TD _extended="true">5.7</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">3</TD><TD _extended="true">28</TD><TD _extended="true">74.1</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">6</TD><TD _extended="true">6.0</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD></TR><TR class=ltblueback _extended="true"><TD _extended="true">7</TD><TD _extended="true">10/21 </TD><TD _extended="true">BAL (http://www.nfl.com/teams/profile?team=BAL)</TD><TD _extended="true">W 19-14 (http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=29284&displayPage=tab_gamecenter&season=2007&seasonType=REG&week=7)</TD></TD _extended="true"><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">11</TD><TD _extended="true">21</TD><TD _extended="true"></TD><TD _extended="true">153</TD><TD _extended="true">7.3</TD><TD _extended="true">0</TD><TD _extended="true">1</TD><TD _extended="true">2</TD><TD _extended="true">14</TD><TD _extended="true">56.2</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD><TD _extended="true">--</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

took brady three games to throw a touchdown.

Tatonka
10-24-2007, 09:54 PM
oh, well ****.. edwards is tom brady then!

camelcowboy
10-24-2007, 09:57 PM
oh, well ****.. edwards is tom brady then! Lol he's chuck norris

Mitchy moo
10-24-2007, 09:59 PM
Lol he's chuck norris

Hopefully he'll be able to kick Bruschi in the........

Tatonka
10-24-2007, 10:21 PM
chuck norris uses live rattlesnakes as condoms.

tom brady doesnt use condoms.

Mitchy moo
10-24-2007, 10:32 PM
chuck norris uses live rattlesnakes as condoms.

tom brady doesnt use condoms.

With those chicks?? Who would? Their all hot and rich so what's the drawback, child support? They make more than him so no risk there and a good way to prove he really did nailed them to his friends, satan / lucifer.

Ickybaluky
10-25-2007, 07:11 AM
That wasn't Brady's first year, it was his first year starting. As a rookie he was 1-for-3 for 6 yards.

Brady had a full offseason of pro conditioning and work in their system before 2001, when he became the starter (thank you Mo Lewis!). That makes a huge difference, and it isn't an advantage Edwards has yet.

billsburgh
10-25-2007, 07:15 AM
That wasn't Brady's first year, it was his first year starting. As a rookie he was 1-for-3 for 6 yards.

Brady had a full offseason of pro conditioning and work in their system before 2001, when he became the starter (thank you Mo Lewis!). That makes a huge difference, and it isn't an advantage Edwards has yet.
so I guess we should blame Mo Lewis for bringing Bledsoe to Buffalo. :ill:

Inetpub
10-25-2007, 07:36 AM
oh, well ****.. edwards is tom brady then!

And yet we can say the same about putting Loserman in the same sentence as edwards. Mr. Zero doesnt fit in same line as TE.

I have as many wins in the NFL as Mr. Zero this year. And I've never suited up for an NFL game. I have as many TD's as Mr. Zero in the NFL. But technically I probably have more b/c I have thrown for 50+ tds in my backyard football league.

You can almost say Mr. Zero is almost completely a 0 stat guy but there is one stat he owns well.

1 = number of benchwarmers on the Buffalo Bills sideline.:brush:

superbills
10-25-2007, 01:34 PM
so I guess we should blame Mo Lewis for bringing Bledsoe to Buffalo. :ill:

YES! Death to Mo Lewis!:bad:

OpIv37
10-25-2007, 01:50 PM
Seriously, can we cut this **** out already? Edwards' first 3 games vs Losman's or Manning's or Brady's or Elways.... it doesn't mean **** because they're on different teams with different talent levels and playing different teams. I bet there are a million QB's who had similar stats in the first 3 games that never amounted to anything.

You can't draw any conclusions from a sample size of 3 games, and you can't make valid comparisons to QB's from different teams playing different opponents.

djjimkelly
10-25-2007, 02:09 PM
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| WK OPP | CMP ATT PYD TD INT | RSH YD TD |
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| 2 nyj (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nyj2001.htm) | 5 10 46 0 0 | 1 9 0 |
| 3 ind (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt2001.htm) | 13 23 168 0 0 | 1 2 0 |
| 4 mia (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/mia2001.htm) | 12 24 86 0 0 | 2 9 0 |
| 5 sdg (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sdg2001.htm) | 33 54 364 2 0 | 1 0 0 |
| 6 ind (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt2001.htm) | 16 20 202 3 0 | 2 -2 0 |
| 7 den (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/den2001.htm) | 25 38 203 2 4 | 2 -1 0 |
| 8 atl (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/atl2001.htm) | 21 31 250 3 0 | 3 0 0 |
| 9 buf (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf2001.htm) | 15 21 107 1 1 | 4 -1 0 |
| 10 stl (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram2001.htm) | 19 27 185 1 2 | 2 6 0 |
| 11 nor (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nor2001.htm) | 19 26 258 4 0 | 4 14 0 |
| 12 nyj (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nyj2001.htm) | 20 28 213 0 0 | 3 0 0 |
| 13 cle (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle2001.htm) | 19 28 218 0 2 | 4 -3 0 |
| 14 buf (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf2001.htm) | 19 35 237 0 1 | 3 13 0 |
| 15 mia (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/mia2001.htm) | 11 19 108 1 0 | 3 -5 0 |
| 17 car (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car2001.htm) | 17 29 198 1 2 | 1 2 0 |
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
| TOTAL | 264 413 2843 18 12 | 36 43 0
|+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
</PRE>

By no means I equate Edwards to Brady. Just a little pespective on even the greatest QB today started out a little slow. And he already had a year on Edwards in terms of experience. I'm troubled by Edwards INTs, something Brady always seemed to avoid at crucial times. Then again Edwards is a true rookie, he didn't get a chance to sit and watch. By comparison, even the great Peyton Manning had more INTs than TDs in his rookie season.
</PRE>


</PRE>

The biggest attribute of Brady is his improvement, even after winning 1st superbowl. We can only hope Edwards improves as he plays.
</PRE>



delusional. losman benching was a personality conflict im sure of it.

and edwards the next brady LMAO beat another team besides JETS and the incompetant boller.

im waiting to see what edwards does when the D has an off game

jamze132
10-25-2007, 06:22 PM
I saw Todd Collins throw a TD once... Who would have thought he wouldn't turn out to be Joe Montana!

SABURZFAN
10-25-2007, 06:27 PM
i seriously doubt that Edwards will ever achieve Brady status but it would be nice if he were close.

SABURZFAN
10-25-2007, 06:29 PM
I saw Todd Collins throw a TD once... Who would have thought he wouldn't turn out to be Joe Montana!


wasn't it Larry Felser who said that Collins would be the next Kelly?if so,he must have wrote that after a case of Genny Cream Ale.

jamze132
10-25-2007, 06:56 PM
i seriously doubt that Edwards will ever achieve Brady status but it would be nice if he were close.
I don't know if we will ever see another Tom Brady again. This guy is just sick right now. Must be all the poon he's pullin'!

jamze132
10-25-2007, 06:56 PM
wasn't it Larry Felser who said that Collins would be the next Kelly?if so,he must have wrote that after a case of Genny Cream Ale.
I put Felser and Kiper on the same level...