PDA

View Full Version : Other than for Price our Offense has no injuries to starters



Wys Guy
10-28-2007, 09:53 PM
From the beginning of the season we've only lost Price to injury.

So why is our offense performing to a fraction of what it did last season.

Weren't we promised a better line with the acquisitions of Dockery and Walker by Levy and Jauron?

So where's the beef!

Why hasn't it not only not gone the way that Levy and Dick said it would, but why is it worse?

With these massive linemen, why isn't the line blocking at least as well as last season's line? How come Peters can't play as well as he did last year?

Any suggestions? Injuries are clearly absolutely no excuse for the O.

justasportsfan
10-28-2007, 09:57 PM
WRONG ! Our starting offensive Coordinator is injured. He's paralyzed , neck up.

TacklingDummy
10-28-2007, 10:02 PM
From the beginning of the season we've only lost Price to injury.




I know JP is easy to forget but he was injuried this season.

TacklingDummy
10-28-2007, 10:03 PM
Any suggestions? Injuries are clearly absolutely no excuse for the O.

Poor QB play at times, bad penalties at times, bad play calling alot of the times, bad red zone play all of the time.

acehole
10-28-2007, 10:06 PM
WRONG ! Fairchild is injured. He has paralyzed , neck up.


We can all agree on that...but was price addition by subtraction?
Josh Reed does his job when asked.....

acehole
10-28-2007, 10:07 PM
Poor QB play at times, bad penalties at times, bad play calling alot of the times, bad red zone play all of the time.

Thanks but these can not be excuses for T Edwards right?
Just checking as we were not aloud to uses these for JP.

jamze132
10-28-2007, 10:14 PM
Fairchild is probably the biggst reason for our offensive woes thus far.

TigerJ
10-28-2007, 10:16 PM
Interestingly, the offense got some yardage today, (347 net yards versus 254 for the Jets) but could not sustain drives. Starting Edwards clearly diminishes the Bills capacity to score of long passing plays, but I don't think that accounts for all of the difference.

TacklingDummy
10-28-2007, 10:19 PM
Thanks but these can not be excuses for T Edwards right?
Just checking as we were not aloud to uses these for JP.

You can use the first excuse of the 4 for JP. :up:

acehole
10-28-2007, 10:21 PM
Interestingly, the offense got some yardage today, (347 net yards versus 254 for the Jets) but could not sustain drives. Starting Edwards clearly diminishes the Bills capacity to score of long passing plays, but I don't think that accounts for all of the difference.

No really? TD passes are overated then?

The Jets might be the only team we will beat with int's and incompletions.

TheBrownBear
10-28-2007, 10:38 PM
Combination of qb play and playcalling. Neither qb has been better than mediocre (except for TE during first Jets game). The playcalling has lacked imagination. Also, doesn't help that Lynch still can't pick up the blitz. It telegraphs our playcalling when we have to pull Lynch out on every passing situation.

Oaf
10-29-2007, 12:28 AM
Thanks for the well-needed dose of reality there, Wys. :rolleyes:
Same time, same place tomorrow?