PDA

View Full Version : AS if the Pats needed more help



patmoran2006
11-10-2007, 08:53 AM
Even after being stripped of their own first round pick once they officially make the playoffs; the Pats still own SF's first round pick next year after trading their 28th overall this pat april so the 49ers could take Joe Staley.

At this rate, at 2-6 SF is going to finish near the bottom of the league. Their is a strong possibility New England is going to get a top 5 pick in next year's draft to.

You gotta be ****ing kidding me. The best team in the league, maybe ever.. Is going to get a top 5 pick?

Confused
11-10-2007, 09:01 AM
the rich get richer................

gr8slayer
11-10-2007, 09:01 AM
They're the best team in my lifetime.

Confused
11-10-2007, 09:21 AM
Ive never hated a team more in my lifetime.

YardRat
11-10-2007, 12:10 PM
They should be excluded completely from the first round as punishment, regardless of whose picks they have and how many they own.

hydro
11-10-2007, 12:18 PM
They should be excluded completely from the first round as punishment, regardless of whose picks they have and how many they own.
They should take a draft off, so that teams can catch up...

SABuffalo786
11-10-2007, 12:25 PM
Don't the Pats suck with draft picks?

hydro
11-10-2007, 01:16 PM
Don't the Pats suck with draft picks?

Sarcasm?

They have basically built there "dynasty" on draft picks....

Ickybaluky
11-10-2007, 01:50 PM
The other part of that trade will end up being the best part. They received SF's 2008 1st along with 4th in 2007 (#110) for their 1st in 2007 (used on Joe Staley).

The 4th they received from the 49ers was the pick they traded to Oakland for Randy Moss.

SABuffalo786
11-10-2007, 02:39 PM
Sarcasm?

They have basically built there "dynasty" on draft picks....


I heard a stat on WGR saying something like the Pats have the lowest retention rate of draftees from the last 5 years in the division.

hydro
11-10-2007, 11:57 PM
2000 - Tom Brady
2001 - Richard Seymour
Matt Light
2002 - Deion Branch
2003 - Asante Samuel
2004 - Vince Wilfork
Ben Watson

Only since 2005 have they really been bad. These players, except Branch who they don't have anymore, have been key players on the team. I wouldn't say that is too bad...

Ebenezer
11-11-2007, 12:02 AM
You gotta be ****ing kidding me. The best team in the league, maybe ever.. Is going to get a top 5 pick?

geez...smart front office...

Michael82
11-11-2007, 01:01 AM
They should be excluded completely from the first round as punishment, regardless of whose picks they have and how many they own.
EXACTLY! :bf1:

gr8slayer
11-11-2007, 09:10 AM
They should be excluded completely from the first round as punishment, regardless of whose picks they have and how many they own.
:down:

Ickybaluky
11-11-2007, 09:13 AM
Only since 2005 have they really been bad. These players, except Branch who they don't have anymore, have been key players on the team. I wouldn't say that is too bad...

While you can criticize Maroney, how has been nagged by injuries and dances too much at times, and Meriweather, although it seems a little early to write him off, how can you say Logan Mankins (2005) was a bad pick?

Mankins is already considered one of the best all-around OG in the NFL and is probably the Pats best OL.

hydro
11-11-2007, 10:55 AM
While you can criticize Maroney, how has been nagged by injuries and dances too much at times, and Meriweather, although it seems a little early to write him off, how can you say Logan Mankins (2005) was a bad pick?

Mankins is already considered one of the best all-around OG in the NFL and is probably the Pats best OL.

I have never heard of him, but ill take your word for it. You know more about the Pats then i do.

gr8slayer
11-11-2007, 11:02 AM
I have never heard of him, but ill take your word for it. You know more about the Pats then i do.
He is a beast, I would still take Neal over him though.