Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bufftp
    Hi Dave!

    Administrator Emeritus
    • Jul 2002
    • 18062

    Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

    Instead maybe we should be bemoaning the lack of recievers. That is the real crux of our offensive woes.
    Photobucket


    In the end, there are only three liberal archetypes: The fools, the beneficiaries and the crooks.
    "If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day, but if you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life"
    Optyimus Ignorus Realityious!

    "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
    - John F. Kennedy, January 20, 1961

    To live in the presence of great truths and eternal laws,
    to be led by permanent ideals -
    that is what keeps a man patient
    when the world ignores him,
    and calm and unspoiled when the world praises him. -- Honore De Balzac

  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86202

    #2
    Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again...QB is the most over-rated position in all professional sports.

    If you've got all the other pieces of the puzzle in place, you can still win a title with Trent Dilfer or Mark Rypien.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

    Comment

    • shelby
      The Vanilla *****
      • Jul 2002
      • 48489

      #3
      Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's


      Comment

      • HHURRICANE
        Registered User
        • Mar 2005
        • 15490

        #4
        Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

        We need halp at WR, no doubt. Ihave yet to see enough of Edwrads to say he's the answer but I like what I've seen so far.

        If you can't read D's, check down, and get rid of the ball it doesn't matter if you have the Pats receiving corps. It's not like Rex Grossman or David Carr don't have guys to pass to.

        Comment

        • Bufftp
          Hi Dave!

          Administrator Emeritus
          • Jul 2002
          • 18062

          #5
          Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

          If you can't read D's, or you check down to quick, and get rid of the ball 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage most of the time, it doesn't matter if you have the Pats receiving corps. It's not like Rex Grossman or David Carr don't have guys to pass to.
          Photobucket


          In the end, there are only three liberal archetypes: The fools, the beneficiaries and the crooks.
          "If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day, but if you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life"
          Optyimus Ignorus Realityious!

          "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
          - John F. Kennedy, January 20, 1961

          To live in the presence of great truths and eternal laws,
          to be led by permanent ideals -
          that is what keeps a man patient
          when the world ignores him,
          and calm and unspoiled when the world praises him. -- Honore De Balzac

          Comment

          • jamze132
            Don’t hate…
            • Jun 2003
            • 29346

            #6
            Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

            Our biggest reason for a lackluster offense is the coordinator. The Pats seemed to play pretty good last year with no recievers.

            Comment

            • YardRat
              Well, lookie here...
              • Dec 2004
              • 86202

              #7
              Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

              Originally posted by jamze132
              Our biggest reason for a lackluster offense is the coordinator. The Pats seemed to play pretty good last year with no recievers.
              The Pats have played pretty good the last half-dozen years regardless of who their coordinator or receivers were.
              YardRat Wall of Fame
              #56 DARRYL TALLEY
              #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

              Comment

              • Bufftp
                Hi Dave!

                Administrator Emeritus
                • Jul 2002
                • 18062

                #8
                Re: Maybe we shouldn't be debating the QB's

                Originally posted by YardRat
                The Pats have played pretty good the last half-dozen years regardless of who their coordinator or receivers were.
                Brady is a one in twenty years QB.
                Now Yard back to reality.
                If we had Two legit let alone three legit recieving threats we would have less issues with either QB.
                Photobucket


                In the end, there are only three liberal archetypes: The fools, the beneficiaries and the crooks.
                "If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day, but if you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life"
                Optyimus Ignorus Realityious!

                "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
                - John F. Kennedy, January 20, 1961

                To live in the presence of great truths and eternal laws,
                to be led by permanent ideals -
                that is what keeps a man patient
                when the world ignores him,
                and calm and unspoiled when the world praises him. -- Honore De Balzac

                Comment

                Working...
                X