PDA

View Full Version : If you could take away any 2 players from the Pats team who would you take ?



Mitchy moo
11-16-2007, 10:27 AM
I would take away Moss & Brady from the Pats, they do not have a backup that can handle the offense like Tom nor catch like Moss. If they we're not able to play the rest of this season for some reason, I think the pats would go 12-4 at best, they are that important.

I feel the Bills need to key on those 2 players.

madness
11-16-2007, 10:31 AM
Brady and Matt Light.

BAM
11-16-2007, 10:44 AM
Tom Brady & Mike Vrabel.

Don't Panic
11-16-2007, 10:45 AM
You take Brady away from this team and they are lucky to go 10-6.

don137
11-16-2007, 10:48 AM
Brady and Bruschi just so I don't have to hear there names and the man crush.

Tatonka
11-16-2007, 10:49 AM
brady moss.

Mitchy moo
11-16-2007, 10:50 AM
You take Brady away from this team and they are lucky to go 10-6. I think your right and that still maybe high.

Ickybaluky
11-16-2007, 10:53 AM
Offensively, Brady is the obvious choice. He is probably the key to everything they are able to do.

Defensively, I think the player they would most miss is Wilfork. They wouldn't be able to play their base 3-4 look without him, and while they are deep on the DL they don't have another player with is skill set. He anchors the middle and allows their LB to do their jobs. If he were gone, they probably would have to switch to more 4-3 looks.

Don't Panic
11-16-2007, 10:55 AM
I think your right and that still maybe high.
Agreed... 9-7 and struggling to make the playoffs is probably closer to the truth.

HHURRICANE
11-16-2007, 10:59 AM
Without Brady you need to run so I'd take away Faulk or Maroney in additon to.

Mitchy moo
11-16-2007, 11:10 AM
Without Brady you need to run so I'd take away Faulk or Maroney in additon to.

If you think about it we have like 12 players on IR and another few who are injured so they cannot play, yet we are above .500 mid-season. It's really tough to lose all those starters and yet still have the depth to be able to play above .500 ball. You cannot attribute that the previous coaches / regime so I have to give Marv & Crew credit.

If the Pats lost 12 starters to IR, they would have a tough time being above .500, especially Brady their starting QB like our loss of JP for a few games. I just wanted to point out that fact while we discuss who the pats would miss most.

Devin
11-16-2007, 11:13 AM
Brady and Wilfork no question.

HHURRICANE
11-16-2007, 11:20 AM
If you think about it we have like 12 players on IR and another few who are injured so they cannot play, yet we are above .500 mid-season. It's really tough to lose all those starters and yet still have the depth to be able to play above .500 ball. You cannot attribute that the previous coaches / regime so I have to give Marv & Crew credit.

If the Pats lost 12 starters to IR, they would have a tough time being above .500, especially Brady their starting QB like our loss of JP for a few games. I just wanted to point out that fact while we discuss who the pats would miss most.

Not sure where you were going with but I agree?!

On Sirrius today Dan Reeves gave more credit to Marv than Jauron stating that he had done an exceptional job on personnel.

FYI.

PECKERWOOD
11-16-2007, 01:57 PM
Brady and Harrison.

SquishDaFish
11-16-2007, 03:09 PM
Brady and Belicheat

Bone
11-16-2007, 03:17 PM
Brady and Welker.

hydro
11-16-2007, 03:22 PM
Moss really isn't a threat without a good QB. Once the newbie screws up Moss will throw a hissy and give up.

I would say Brady and Wilfork.

G Wolly
11-16-2007, 03:30 PM
Brady and Seymour

Elminster
11-16-2007, 04:17 PM
Brady and Vrabel. The former is obvious, the latter is perhaps the biggest cheap-shot artist on the entire team, which is really saying something.

raphael120
11-16-2007, 04:25 PM
How bout just 1 thing. The Pats Gatoraide. They'll be dehydrated by halftime and be passing out.