Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

[bigbub2352]

Keith Ellison in my opinion is a shell of his former self from last year, maybe it is not playing with TKO and Fletch, or playing next to DIG, and Crowell, but Ellison is gettin blown away out there, u never see him in plays and i think he just might be too small to play OLB, i think he would be great depth, but a starter he is not,
i am hoping and praying for Carlos Dansby from ARZ or and i doubt it we take a run at Lance briggs, Poz either one of those two and Crowell, will sure make things alot more interesting for us on D
Just think that when a LBer isnt making plays for a Defense that makes ur LBer and attacking one and he still doesnt make plays, this means he is being dominated and that was obvious the last 3-4 games

[justasportsfan]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Move DiG or Poz to OLB.

[The Answer]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Keith Ellison in my opinion is a shell of his former self from last year, maybe it is not playing with TKO and Fletch, or playing next to DIG, and Crowell, but Ellison is gettin blown away out there, u never see him in plays and i think he just might be too small to play OLB, i think he would be great depth, but a starter he is not,
i am hoping and praying for Carlos Dansby from ARZ or and i doubt it we take a run at Lance briggs, Poz either one of those two and Crowell, will sure make things alot more interesting for us on D
Just think that when a LBer isnt making plays for a Defense that makes ur LBer and attacking one and he still doesnt make plays, this means he is being dominated and that was obvious the last 3-4 games

This is why we will make an attempt to go after Lance Briggs in the offseason - even though we will not offer near the amount of money he will be looking for.

~The Answer

[OpIv37]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. This guy was only on the field last year due to injuries. I can't want to get Poz back next year - hopefully he or DiG can play outside.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. This guy was only on the field last year due to injuries. I can't want to get Poz back next year - hopefully he or DiG can play outside.

Don't gloat. You've been wrong about other things.

[camelcowboy]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Crowell isn't the answer either, he looked pretty bad yesterday.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Crowell isn't the answer either, he looked pretty bad yesterday.

Crowell is the answer the teams are keying on him and letting the other 2 get run thru, Dig and Ellison will be good depth but starters they are not, Poz stays in the middle, Crowell on the outside, and draft of FA sign the replacement for Ellison, doesnt help much either that our Dline gets run thru as well

[Romes]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

OLB, CB and FS are all positions that need upgrading on the D.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

OLB, CB and FS are all positions that need upgrading on the D.

I Like Kyle WIlliams but he's not a starter. We need to be dominant up the middle. Our DT's have disappeared the last few games. We can't keep stacking the line with 8 to help the DT's stop the run.

[hydro]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Crowell isn't the answer either, he looked pretty bad yesterday.

Gannon showed how much of a liability he can be at times.

[Romes]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

I Like Kyle WIlliams but he's not a starter. We need to be dominant up the middle. Our DT's have disappeared the last few games. We can't keep stacking the line with 8 to help the DT's stop the run.

I actually think the DT's have been good for the most part.

If the LB's could fill the gaps properly and tackle maybe Donte wouldn't need to come up.

Truthfully speaking there is no one on D that really is irreplaceable.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

I actually think the DT's have been good for the most part.

If the LB's could fill the gaps properly and tackle maybe Donte wouldn't need to come up.

Truthfully speaking there is no one on D that really is irreplaceable.

our DT's are not collapsing the pocket. THey are not pressuring the qb's up the middle. They only suffice against average O's. They aren't good enough against playoff teams.

I don't want to have to send our lb'ers or safeties to stop the run or send pressure all the time .

[EDS]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

Crowell isn't the answer either, he looked pretty bad yesterday.

If Crowell isn't the answer the team is in big trouble because he is the best defensive player the team has.

[raphael120]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

So let's see...we have the same holes we had when Marv got here...plus some!

Great work Marv!!!

[EDS]

Re: Is it ok to say Keith Ellison is not the answer at OLB!

I actually think the DT's have been good for the most part.

If the LB's could fill the gaps properly and tackle maybe Donte wouldn't need to come up.

Truthfully speaking there is no one on D that really is irreplaceable.

The defensive tackles have done nothing for two years now. The Bills desperately need a DT that can stuff the run and make some plays.