PDA

View Full Version : Clayton's salary cap update for all teams



clumping platelets
03-31-2003, 11:41 AM
http://espn.go.com/nfl/columns/clayton_john/1510617.html


Bills have $8.074 million according to Mr. Clayton. Eb & I are within $500,000 of that number using estimates for Reese and Adams :D

Ebenezer
03-31-2003, 11:45 AM
do the clayton numbers include Adams?? I'd like the official numbers though...I bet that they can still squeeze Ismail and Gary or Gash without a problem...NOW EXTEND WINFIELD!

Gunzlingr
03-31-2003, 01:24 PM
Titans are $1,110 dollars under! What can they sign with that?!

Ed
03-31-2003, 01:24 PM
how much do they need for rookies?

don137
03-31-2003, 02:05 PM
Originally posted by gunzlingr
Titans are $1,110 dollars under! What can they sign with that?!

Jake Arians :D

Ebenezer
03-31-2003, 02:25 PM
they can draft...rookie signing don't happen until after 6/1...at that point they can cut a guy to sign their first and second rounder. The rest won't count against the top 51 until opening day.

Throne Logic
03-31-2003, 03:36 PM
How dumb is AZ? They are over $17 Million UNDER the cap, yet they let Boston get away. Jake wasn't going to stay, regardless of their offer. But, jeeze, no wonder they can't win any games.

venis2k1
03-31-2003, 03:52 PM
Boston Didnt want to stay.

G. Host
03-31-2003, 03:56 PM
Neither did Peerless.
Boston got his money quick enough and if AZ had been willing to take a chance they could have got something for him. Good for us they didn't.


Originally posted by venis2k1
Boston Didnt want to stay.

JayWood
03-31-2003, 04:48 PM
$500,000 off Clump/Eb...come on guys your slippin!!! Just kidding of course, you guys are the best, great job. I agree with a few others lets give AW a contract extension.

Doc
03-31-2003, 07:26 PM
Clump: How much do you think the Bills will need to set-aside for signing the rooks? I thought I remember reading $3M, but I can't recall if that was pre- or post-Price trade?

itsandthings
03-31-2003, 07:37 PM
Clayton's numbers don't include Adams, but they do include Reese (he signed for short money). Adams has a $1.375M cap number for 2003, and with him included the Bills have $6,634,965 of cap room using the Top-51 rule.

Gash's signing is also not included in the number, although he is likely signed for barely over minimum and would only take up about $175K of cap room (using the Top-51 rule).

Doc
03-31-2003, 08:09 PM
Are you sure about Clayton's numbers not including Adams'? I can see Gash's, but seeing as how the contract was officially signed 3 days ago, I would expect it to be included.

Doc
03-31-2003, 11:05 PM
Forget my question above (as if you didn't already!) about how much it would take to sign the draftees ($2-2.5M is what I read on "The Salary Cap Zone"). I also think Clayton's number DO reflect Adams' cap hit, since it was 3 days ago that the contract was signed and there was no disclaimer from Clayton about it.

clumping platelets
04-01-2003, 01:12 AM
Clayton's numbers include Zach Thomas for Miami but not Adams from the Bills? Hmmmmm.......

Bruce is Loose
04-01-2003, 12:46 PM
When you click on the link it has Sam Adams under players signed so i imagine he is included.

Doc
04-01-2003, 01:47 PM
There you go! Subtract the $2.5M (tops) needed to sign the rookies and the Bills have another $5.5M to spend on FA's or whatever.

Ebenezer
04-01-2003, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by itsandthings
Clayton's numbers don't include Adams, but they do include Reese (he signed for short money). Adams has a $1.375M cap number for 2003, and with him included the Bills have $6,634,965 of cap room using the Top-51 rule.

Gash's signing is also not included in the number, although he is likely signed for barely over minimum and would only take up about $175K of cap room (using the Top-51 rule).


I would like to get a read on the LTBE and NLTBE bonuses in Adams contract. I bet that pushes the total higher than $1.375M.

Ebenezer
04-01-2003, 04:26 PM
Originally posted by Doc
There you go! Subtract the $2.5M (tops) needed to sign the rookies and the Bills have another $5.5M to spend on FA's or whatever.


You folks are going to get sick of me saying this:

USE SOME OF THE EXTRA MONEY AND EXTEND WINFIELD!!!!

The_Philster
04-01-2003, 04:27 PM
I'm not gonna get sick of it, Eb ;)

TedMock
04-01-2003, 04:59 PM
I agree Eb. That old football cliche, "you can never have too many good corners", seemed to miss Buffalo the last couple of seasons. Winfield/Clements could be one of the best starting tandoms in the league for several years provided we 1. keep them together and 2. the D-Line forces bad decisions on opposing qb's. They still need another couple CB's. I like what Thomas did late in the year but a few good games doesn't win my full vote of dedication and confidence.

Doc
04-01-2003, 05:31 PM
Eb, extending Winfield falls under "whatever."

Bufftp
04-01-2003, 06:31 PM
with 9 teams 2.7 million or less under the cap june first should be interersting