why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

    In the Cover 2 system, the S's have the lions share of the coverage. I feel our biggest weakness in the secondary was at S after we lost Simpson. Whitner is solid as hell but how can we feel "safe" on the other half of the field?

    Greer is very very solid if not an Asante Samuel in the making. McGee is up and down but is a solid corner.

    Add a Bob Sanders in to the mix, a stud OLB, and another solid DT and our D is much much better.

    This would be a great move for us. Safeties cost much less than CB's, it helps against the pass and the run. The guy is a proven stud in the Cover 2, hes an overachiever with a great character, hes young, and hes a great leader.

    Why the hell not?

  • billsburgh
    Registered User
    • Jul 2003
    • 3560

    #2
    Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

    Whitner and Sanders play the same position.

    Comment

    • The Jokeman
      Registered User
      • Dec 2003
      • 9995

      #3
      Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

      Originally posted by EdwardsEra
      In the Cover 2 system, the S's have the lions share of the coverage. I feel our biggest weakness in the secondary was at S after we lost Simpson. Whitner is solid as hell but how can we feel "safe" on the other half of the field?

      Greer is very very solid if not an Asante Samuel in the making. McGee is up and down but is a solid corner.

      Add a Bob Sanders in to the mix, a stud OLB, and another solid DT and our D is much much better.

      This would be a great move for us. Safeties cost much less than CB's, it helps against the pass and the run. The guy is a proven stud in the Cover 2, hes an overachiever with a great character, hes young, and hes a great leader.

      Why the hell not?
      The D while statistically bad hasn't played bad this season. Not to mention Sanders plays the same position as Donte Whitner, probably the best guy we have in the secondary right now and not really ia position in need of an upgrade. Toss in Sanders asking price might be too high it just doesn't add up we get him.

      Comment

      • X-Era
        What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
        • Feb 2005
        • 27670

        #4
        Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

        Originally posted by billsburgh
        Whitner and Sanders play the same position.
        Whitner has already shown the speed to play CB, he certainly can be moved to FS. Having a SS play FS helps the run, if your guy can also cover like a CB, your in great shape.

        Comment

        • BidsJr
          Registered User
          • Sep 2002
          • 2858

          #5
          Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

          Originally posted by EdwardsEra
          In the Cover 2 system, the S's have the lions share of the coverage. I feel our biggest weakness in the secondary was at S after we lost Simpson. Whitner is solid as hell but how can we feel "safe" on the other half of the field?

          Greer is very very solid if not an Asante Samuel in the making. McGee is up and down but is a solid corner.

          Add a Bob Sanders in to the mix, a stud OLB, and another solid DT and our D is much much better.

          This would be a great move for us. Safeties cost much less than CB's, it helps against the pass and the run. The guy is a proven stud in the Cover 2, hes an overachiever with a great character, hes young, and hes a great leader.

          Why the hell not?
          Because the Colts are about as likely to let Manning go as they are Bob Sanders.
          "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

          Comment

          • Confused
            All-Pro Zoner
            • Jun 2007
            • 2479

            #6
            Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

            it would be nice.

            If we got sanders, then who will sign all the has beens, almost beens and never will be's? Cmon- we never sign proven talent. Its not the buffalo way.

            Comment

            • BidsJr
              Registered User
              • Sep 2002
              • 2858

              #7
              Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

              Originally posted by hoofhearted
              it would be nice.

              If we got sanders, then who will sign all the has beens, almost beens and never will be's? Cmon- we never sign proven talent. Its not the buffalo way.
              That's true I guess. Dockery was a has been.

              Oh wait....
              "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

              Comment

              • BidsJr
                Registered User
                • Sep 2002
                • 2858

                #8
                Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                Originally posted by hoofhearted
                it would be nice.

                If we got sanders, then who will sign all the has beens, almost beens and never will be's? Cmon- we never sign proven talent. Its not the buffalo way.
                That's true I guess. Dockery was a has been.

                Oh wait....
                "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

                Comment

                • Confused
                  All-Pro Zoner
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 2479

                  #9
                  Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                  dockery was/is overrated and we paid way too much for what we got. its either one extreme or another.

                  Comment

                  • BidsJr
                    Registered User
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 2858

                    #10
                    Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                    Originally posted by hoofhearted
                    dockery was/is overrated and we paid way too much for what we got. its either one extreme or another.

                    I think your assessment of talent is overrated.
                    "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

                    Comment

                    • Jan Reimers
                      Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                      • May 2003
                      • 17353

                      #11
                      Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                      Unbelievable. We bring in a quality player like Dockery, and we've spent too much. We pass on overpaying a player like Sanders, where we have a number 1 draft pick playing well at the same position, and we're too cheap.
                      Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                      Comment

                      • Jaybird
                        Registered User
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 1908

                        #12
                        Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                        if anything we sign one 0f the cb, not another saftey

                        Comment

                        • BidsJr
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 2858

                          #13
                          Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                          Originally posted by Jaybird
                          if anything we sign one 0f the cb, not another saftey

                          We run a cover 2.

                          We do not need a highly paid CB.

                          Why do people not understand this?
                          "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

                          Comment

                          • The Jokeman
                            Registered User
                            • Dec 2003
                            • 9995

                            #14
                            Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                            Originally posted by hoofhearted
                            dockery was/is overrated and we paid way too much for what we got. its either one extreme or another.
                            I'll admit Dockery's been better then I thought he'd be. In terms of value, let's compare him to the other free agent LGs who signed similar contracts this past off season.

                            D Dockery: 14 G 14 GS 4 Pen 24 Yds 3 False Start 1 Hold 1.00 Sack 9.00 Sackyds
                            K Dielman: 14 G 14 GS 2 Pen 15 Yds 1 False Start 1 Hold 0.50 Sack 4.50 Sackyds
                            E Steinbach:14 G 14 GS 3 Pen 15 Yds 2 False Start 0 Hold 3.25 Sack 41.25 Sackyds

                            *Dielman was named to the Pro Bowl as an alternate starter.

                            Comment

                            • Bone
                              Bone
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 1093

                              #15
                              Re: why arent many clamoring for Bob Sanders?

                              If you think Bob Sanders is going to leace Indi then your crazy, Colts FO will not allow that to happen.
                              BILLIEVE

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X