If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Was it worth getting rid of the best long snapper in the league for a DE who rarely even steps on the field? Last week against the Browns that bad snap into the end zone changed the game. Today, same story. Bad snap leads to quick 7 and changes the complextion. I used to think having a long snapper specialist was a waste of a spot, not so much now.
I thought it was a mistake at the time, unless they had some really big plans for Neill at DE. They didn't.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
They were dealing with multiple DEs being out and not having players able to rotated with Schobel and Kelsay; they even rotated Jefferson in. I do not think it made a real difference most games until weather started getting rough.
Comment