This is where I see our O is headed next year!

[justasportsfan]

K-Gun . NO huddle O.

Thoughts?

[YardRat]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Depending on who the OC is...Maybe.

I'd run it.

[im4bflo]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Marchabroda?!!!

[justasportsfan]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Depending on who the OC is...Maybe.

I'd run it.

I think MArv will bring in someone who can run it since Dick is clueless about the O.

I think Trent has the brains for it. Don't know if he'll be successful at it.

[im4bflo]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

I think MArv will bring in someone who can run it since Dick is clueless about the O.

I think Trent has the brains for it. Don't know if he'll be successful at it.

man, that's a gamble.

[justasportsfan]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

man, that's a gamble.

what is?

[im4bflo]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

what is?

Like you said, not knowing if Edwards can be succesful in the no huddle.
That would be a gamble.

[Michael82]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Actually, when he has played No huddle this year, he's done a very good job with it. I'm all for that.

[justasportsfan]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Like you said, not knowing if Edwards can be succesful in the no huddle.
That would be a gamble.

Actually no matter what O we run, it's a gamble.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Terrible idea.

Our defense isn't good enough to employ this type of style.

Our goal should be keeping them off the field as long as possible, not throwing them back to the wolves as fast as we can.

We 1-2-3 punt enough as it is, but sometimes run at least a minute off the clock. Imagine going no huddle and 1-2-3 punt. We'll give our porous D about 30 seconds of rest.

This idea is infinitely worse than what Fairchild calls now, sorry Justa.

[justasportsfan]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Terrible idea.

Our defense isn't good enough to employ this type of style.

Our goal should be keeping them off the field as long as possible, not throwing them back to the wolves as fast as we can.

We 1-2-3 punt enough as it is, but sometimes run at least a minute off the clock. Imagine going no huddle and 1-2-3 punt. We'll give our porous D about 30 seconds of rest.

This idea is infinitely worse than what Fairchild calls now, sorry Justa.

I wasn't suggesting we go no huddle. IMO this might be were Marv wants to go.



keeping teams off the filed hasn't produced points for us . Fairchilds system hasn't produced anything for us. Anything is better than Fairchilds system. Fairchilds system does not fool anyone. At least the no huddle might confuse both our O and the opposing D at the same time.


But make no mistake, anything is better than Fairchild.

[Yasgur's Farm]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

I think it would be an excellent idea...

1st of all... "No huddle" doesn't necessarily mean "hurry-up". Indy, for example, does a nice job of taking their time while evaluating the D scheme.

2nd of all... While Edwards isn't Peyton Manning, it would give him more time to recognize the D package at hand and adjust accordingly.

And C... As long as the Bills are at the line of scrimmage, the D can't make substitutions.

In short... The "no huddle", when utilized properly, handcuffs the D in mismatched packages while, at the same time, allows the QB time to evaluate the D and run a play that would optimize results.

[YardRat]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

"No huddle" doesn't necessarily mean "hurry-up".

Exactly.

[yordad]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

I think it would be an excellent idea...

1st of all... "No huddle" doesn't necessarily mean "hurry-up". Indy, for example, does a nice job of taking their time while evaluating the D scheme.

2nd of all... While Edwards isn't Peyton Manning, it would give him more time to recognize the D package at hand and adjust accordingly.

And C... As long as the Bills are at the line of scrimmage, the D can't make substitutions.

In short... The "no huddle", when utilized properly, handcuffs the D in mismatched packages while, at the same time, allows the QB time to evaluate the D and run a play that would optimize results.

Hey draz. I assume you are the same draz from the "other board". Question for you:

What are the drawbacks? Why doesn't every team do it?

[Yasgur's Farm]

Re: This is where I see our O is headed next year!

Hey draz. I assume you are the same draz from the "other board". Question for you:

What are the drawbacks? Why doesn't every team do it?

Hey yordad, welcome to BZ. Yup... I'm the same guy. And a fellow JP supporter as well. Although he kinda left us holding the bag didn't he?

Other than talent on hand and coaching preferences, I couldn't give specific reasons for any scheme over another. I just think in this case taht it gives Trent more time to look things over and use his best asset... his head.