I think that the writing is on the wall. It's just an opinion but I'd be very surprised to see someone from outside the organization hired as our next OC. Lee Evans made a commnet this week during a PC and he refered to Shoenert being a good OC and keeping things the same with continuity. He used a past tense reference like it was already discussed.
Seriously, who would want to bring in someone with a different philosophy? I know our O sucked this year but I don't want to see this team take anymore steps back with learning a new offense. I think that we can build from where we were this year. The o-line has chemistry with all of the same players. The experience for TE has been great. We need to add talent on offense with a true #2 WR, a seam busting, fast TE and involving Lynch more in the passing game. I'd like to see more no huddle and quick slant passes added as well.
There's no where but up to go!
Seriously, who would want to bring in someone with a different philosophy? I know our O sucked this year but I don't want to see this team take anymore steps back with learning a new offense. I think that we can build from where we were this year. The o-line has chemistry with all of the same players. The experience for TE has been great. We need to add talent on offense with a true #2 WR, a seam busting, fast TE and involving Lynch more in the passing game. I'd like to see more no huddle and quick slant passes added as well.
There's no where but up to go!
Comment