DiCesare's News column

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dr. Lecter
    Zero for Zero!
    • Mar 2003
    • 67946

    DiCesare's News column

    Some good stuff. Some stuff that is questionable.

    Brian Campbell’s latest stance on his contract talks — Don’t call me, I’ll call you — is just what the Buffalo Sabres deserve given their infuriating dysfunction.

    They’ve bungled negotiations with another marquee player. They’ve further angered their fan base. And they’ve re-established their ignorance on the issue of team chemistry. There you have it. The season’s first hat trick.

    Rome wasn’t built in a day, nor did it crumble in a day. But apparently that’s only because Tom Golisano wasn’t around to undermine the empire.

    Campbell retreated to a noble position Monday, saying he no longer would discuss anything to do with his contract for fear it would become a lingering distraction to his teammates. That’s all well and good, except that it already has become a distraction, with sensible minds absolving Campbell of all blame. At this time last year the Sabres clung to their organizational policy of shutting down negotiations once the season commenced. They submitted that talking turkey while the pucks were flying might drive a wedge among the playing ranks. Given the circumstances, they had a smidgeon of justification. Both their co-captains were impending free agents, and to negotiate with one could alienate the other. Striving to satisfy both promised to result in a resounding backfire. So they buried the checkbook although they engaged in furtive talks with Chris Drury and tabled an impending resolution.

    On the flip side, by reaching agreement with neither Drury nor Daniel Briere the Sabres gave the other 18 players reason to believe the organization had abandoned the concept of sustained success. Matching Edmonton’s excessive summertime offer for Thomas Vanek may have temporarily appeased a disenchanted fan base but it also invited those on the roster to ask, “What the heck is going on? How are we better off?” The stalemate with Campbell brings them full circle.

    Goaltender Ryan Miller attempted to rally the troops and pacify fans in the aftermath of the Drury-Briere exodus. He reminded everyone that the sky wasn’t falling, that the sun would rise.

    Trouble is, while the sun still ascends, the Sabres have been in free fall during a stretch that has the team
    frequently on the road and frequently matched against the Eastern Conference elite. They’re neither a good team nor an exceedingly bad team but most definitely one that’ll be challenged to make the playoffs. And even should they qualify, their fate has one round and out written all over it. It’s quite a comedown from two seasons that prompted the question: Is this the year?

    The lack of foresight on the part of the owner astounds. Golisano rode in to a hero’s welcome upon purchasing the bankrupt franchise for way below market value. He stands to make a cool $100 million or so when he dumps it. All indications are that he’s in this for investment reasons only, not because he’s driven to win a championship or even tickled by the thought of being a perennial contender. The team could have locked up Drury, Briere, Vanek and Campbell for a yearly figure approximate to what they’re paying Vanek, Derek Roy and Jochen Hecht and Tim Connolly. Oops.



    The last paragraph is questionable at best. And, if they had done so, the News woulod be lamenting letting the younger players, including a 40 goal scorer go.

    And "with sensible minds absolving Campbell of all blame." is assuming a lot, without talking about what offers were made.
    Originally posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.
  • SabreEleven
    Registered User
    • Aug 2002
    • 39563

    #2
    Re: DiCesare's News column

    I can agree with that last paragraph. Regier and that other ****er have said many times that they are barely breaking even as a club even with long runs in the playoffs. Tommy G. HAD to know when he bought the Sabres we wasn't going to make a profit and now it seems that is all he worries about.

    Tommy G., spend the money to win this team a Stanley Cup. Go run for Governer again and you'll get the whole upper state of NY voting for you plus the Canandiens just across the border (ok, not really) but it sounds good.

    Comment

    • SabreEleven
      Registered User
      • Aug 2002
      • 39563

      #3
      Re: DiCesare's News column

      Lecter, why would they let the younger players go when they are cheaper than your Drury's and Briere's?

      Comment

      • RockStar36
        Dude's Little Ignorant Crony
        • Sep 2004
        • 24761

        #4
        Re: DiCesare's News column

        If he spent the money to win a Stanley Cup he would more than break even. A championship in a city thats never had one would be priceless.

        D & S Sports



        Comment

        • Dr. Lecter
          Zero for Zero!
          • Mar 2003
          • 67946

          #5
          Re: DiCesare's News column

          Originally posted by SabreEleven
          Lecter, why would they let the younger players go when they are cheaper than your Drury's and Briere's?
          because once they sign the Drury and Briere's (and Campbell's) they would have no money left.
          Originally posted by mysticsoto
          Lecter is right in everything he said.

          Comment

          • SabreEleven
            Registered User
            • Aug 2002
            • 39563

            #6
            Re: DiCesare's News column

            But would have a greater chance at the Cup.

            Comment

            Working...
            X