If we either:
1- Draft a WR in the first round, or
2- Sign someone who MATTERS in FA
Then I will be happy as we're really trying to better this position.
But if we:
1- Sign someone who matters in FA (Gage, Wilford, whomever)
AND
Draft a WR in the first round.
I will not be happy, because that is setting the wheels in motion to say bye bye to Lee Evans after this year. That's NOT a long-term improvement move, that's our typical "addition by subtraction" for the long haul move.
Anyone get what I'm saying?
We just extended Parrish and we still have Reed, who would be a very good WR, if he was coming off the bench (and almost certainly would be). Those (flip a coin) are/should be our #3/4 WR's for some time to come.
If we were to sign (just using examples here) Wilford OR draft Kelly, that's a good sign.. If we were to sign Wilford AND draft Kelly; you can say goodnite to Lee Evans soon after this season, and that's the **** about this team I HATE.
1- Draft a WR in the first round, or
2- Sign someone who MATTERS in FA
Then I will be happy as we're really trying to better this position.
But if we:
1- Sign someone who matters in FA (Gage, Wilford, whomever)
AND
Draft a WR in the first round.
I will not be happy, because that is setting the wheels in motion to say bye bye to Lee Evans after this year. That's NOT a long-term improvement move, that's our typical "addition by subtraction" for the long haul move.
Anyone get what I'm saying?
We just extended Parrish and we still have Reed, who would be a very good WR, if he was coming off the bench (and almost certainly would be). Those (flip a coin) are/should be our #3/4 WR's for some time to come.
If we were to sign (just using examples here) Wilford OR draft Kelly, that's a good sign.. If we were to sign Wilford AND draft Kelly; you can say goodnite to Lee Evans soon after this season, and that's the **** about this team I HATE.
Comment