If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
The Bills are targeting a big receiver to complement Lee Evans and may be interested in Malcolm Kelly with the No. 11 pick in the draft. The team had a glaring need for a second wide receiver even before they released Peerless Price. The early entrant Kelly boasts great size and strong hands, but he may be a reach early in the first round.
I'd prefer some D help in the 1st, but we need to take the best player on the board that fills any one of our most pressing needs of DL, LB, TE or WR.
The best DL will be gone probably, and there aren't any TE rated this high I do believe
but we really need to wait until after the combine to get a better idea where many of these players will be rated to go, and who moves up and who slips back
If we trade with Brohm, the value suggests we can get pick 20, plus their 3rd and 4th .... thats if we cannot get a 2nd rounder from someone who might move up for a QB like Brohm. Either way we could move back in the 2nd round and pick up a big WR
Kelly, Sweed, Hardy, Bowman .... there's not a great deal between them so we should maximise the value of this pick and maybe look to grab a DT like Sims and/or Moore, or LBs like Connor, Alibi, or Henderson
Unless its a team looking for a QB like Brohm that may be there at 11, I dont see many teams wanting to trade UP to the 11th spot.
IF, and obviously we dont know how the Bills feel about him.. But if the Bills really like Kelly, they should stand pat and select him at 11. Dont take a chance he'll be there further down the board.
Unless its a team looking for a QB like Brohm that may be there at 11, I dont see many teams wanting to trade UP to the 11th spot.
IF, and obviously we dont know how the Bills feel about him.. But if the Bills really like Kelly, they should stand pat and select him at 11. Dont take a chance he'll be there further down the board.
I posted an article earlier in the week that listed the Bucs as a potential trade partner because they want to draft a QB for the future.
The Buffalo Bills could take Oklahoma wide receiver Malcolm Kelly with their first draft pick.
DD.comment: No one needs to run better at the Combine than Malcolm Kelly. While most net sites have projected him as a sure-fire first round pick, he got a 2nd round projection from N.F.L. scouts a few weeks ago and the coaching staff at Oklahoma advised him to stay in school, because they felt he was a Potential Fourth Round Pick....So there is an obvious difference between what folks inside the football world think of Malcolm Kelly going into the draft process and what mainstream media and fan sites think.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Any NFL front office guy who significantly upgrades a player over the ream of info they already have on him playing the actual game should stick to being a bean-counter.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment