If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
If it could be guaranteed, I would wait til the second. Heck, there is probably a 3% chance Kelly is still be there. But, I would settle for Sweed. They are both talented, and I would prefer Kelly, but (if guaranteed) I would rather Sweed in the second. Especially if a top 2 DT slips (if we don't do a FA upgrade). And, we probably get better value with Sweed in the second, if we take a top LB.
That said, it can't be guaranteed, so if they went Kelly in the first, especially with an impressive combine, I would be alright with that. Unless of course one of these CBs have an out of the box combine. If a CB raises to deserve top eleven consideration, and has height, I feel that might be the way to go. Role the dice, take a WR in the second. If Sweed is gone, you still got Bowman or Hardy. Especially if Hardy has a good combine (4.4 speed?).
I think Digi fighting Ellison, and the return of Poz makes LB one of the least of concerns. I don't really wanna draft a LB in the first, and I would rather trade down when it comes right down to it.
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
We would look like fools if we drafted a WR at #11 IMO. Why would you waste the #11 pick on WR to be the #2 guy? Thats pretty much like us using a 1st rd pick to draft another DE to throw into a 4 man rotation. We need to draft a LB or NT at #11 and sign a WR in FA.
We would look like fools if we drafted a WR at #11 IMO. Why would you waste the #11 pick on WR to be the #2 guy? Thats pretty much like us using a 1st rd pick to draft another DE to throw into a 4 man rotation. We need to draft a LB or NT at #11 and sign a WR in FA.
i have to totally disagree.
a stud wr or de is a player who will make our team better.
we rush our DEs like demons, so depth always helps, 4 or even 5 guys can really help us especially late in the game.
you can never have too many good wr's (bills of old, new england, colts, rams, etc etc). a stud wr would make everyone on our O better.
as far as kelly and sweed, i think both are studs but kelly is out the gate ready to play moreso than sweed.
The point is, WR is one of those positions which you need more than 1 starter, so it's not like you're drafting in the first round just for depth. You're drafting a starter, regardless if he's 1 or 1a or 1b even.
Tweet
It would be nice to have a Kelly and Reed on the team again. 
" ~ yordad
Comment