If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Really want Malcolm Kelly, but wouldn't be the end of the world if we got Sweed. Both can come in a be a good #2 reciever, both are big recievers and that is what we need. I think Sweed is a reach at the 11th pick. If we moved down a bit and picked up Sweed and another pick that would be great, but wouldn't pick him at 11.
All that to say, either will do but Malcolm Kelly is who I would like to see in a Bills jersey.
It all depends on what we do in free agency. I'm not opposed to a WR in Round 1 but think if we do go after an UFA then the need won't be so great and could see taking a guy like Keith Rivers. As to me he seemingly is a better prospect then any WR listed and think there could be a quality WR prospect could be drafted in Round 2.
I'd be fine with Sweed. Now that he has proved that he has very decent speed, I would have no problem with him being chosen. A tradedown would be great, but not always feasible. We cannot go farther down than the 17-19 block. Both Minnesota at #17 and Philly at #19 are likely to choose WRs and dropping lower than them could mean losing Sweed, Kelly or both and not a risk worth taking...
That being said, the teams between #12-16 don't seem to have the same wants and we are therefore unlikely to find someone to bite and be able to trade down with.
I know alot of people here will be disappointed, but we will likely be forced to overreach and go with a top WR with our #11 pick.
Id take Sweed or Kelly but not at 11, doesnt make any sense considering Thomas and Hardy should be there with our 2nd, and Bowman and Simpson will be there in the 3rd.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Comment