PDA

View Full Version : Will the new look Bills Defense be better than Bruce Smith and Company's Defense?



blackonyx89
03-05-2008, 11:41 AM
I think it can, maybe nastier!!! What's your take?

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 11:43 AM
wow are you jumping the gun or what?

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:45 AM
you need rehab fast:cp:

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 11:46 AM
somebody's been taking too many classes at the espn school of 'broadcasting'

justasportsfan
03-05-2008, 11:46 AM
Bruce and co. were way over rated.

don137
03-05-2008, 11:48 AM
No, Schoebel is not in Bruce's league...Other than DT and maybe saftey the old defense with Bruce man for man was better.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:48 AM
Bruce and co. were way over rated. justasportsfan:boost:

justasportsfan
03-05-2008, 11:49 AM
justasportsfan:boost:
they were. they couldn't even win 1 sb for us. Hosteltler? The redskins? They got owned by the cowboys OL.

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 11:51 AM
everybody knows this veggieman. i wouldn't say overrated, but merely average outside of bruce biscuit and talley. those teams were built on offense.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:52 AM
they were. they couldn't even win 1 sb for us. yea buti blame that ontheoffense

The Spaz
03-05-2008, 11:52 AM
Depends on if we sign Bryant Jonson...:snicker:

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:53 AM
everybody knows this veggieman. i wouldn't say overrated, but merely average outside of bruce biscuit and talley. those teams were built on offense. yea i rlly wouldnt know i wasnt alive yetwell i was forlast one or two but icantremember. ill take your word or it

justasportsfan
03-05-2008, 11:54 AM
yea buti blame that ontheoffense


The Ravens and Bucs D didn't blame their O did they? 4 tries and they couldn't even win one for the O. Actually it's the O that got them there. Like freeman said, outside of Bruce, no one was really great. Our O carried that team.

justasportsfan
03-05-2008, 11:54 AM
yea i rlly wouldnt know i wasnt alive yetwell i was forlast one or two but icantremember. ill take your word or it
but you wouldn't take mine? :mad:

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:56 AM
but you wouldn't take mine? :mad: its ok i believe you

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 11:57 AM
actually if our d hadn't let jeff freakin hostettler have the ball for the entire 3rd quarter our O could have put up 40 points on the giants easily.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:58 AM
The Ravens and Bucs D didn't blame their O did they? 4 tries and they couldn't even win one for the O. Actually it's the O that got them there. Like freeman said, outside of Bruce, no one was really great. Our O carried that team. yea they actually wontho. and their O played deceent inthose games. Don't you remember trent dilfer. The worst decision the ravens made was cutting him. nowthey are left with super boller and an undersized heisman winner

The Spaz
03-05-2008, 11:59 AM
actually if our d hadn't let jeff freakin hostettler have the ball for the entire 3rd quarter our O could have put up 40 points on the giants easily.

Stop, the pain is coming back...:cry:

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 11:59 AM
actually if our d hadn't let jeff freakin hostettler have the ball for the entire 3rd quarter our O could have put up 40 points on the giants easily. or if kelly and co.could have gotten a few more yards so our pussy legged kicker could make a feild goal

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 12:01 PM
that pussy legged kicker won us a bunch of games. he wasn't a long range kicker. cripes. in fact i dont think he made a kick over 40 yards all year on grass, though i could be wrong on that.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 12:04 PM
that pussy legged kicker won us a bunch of games. he wasn't a long range kicker. cripes. in fact i dont think he made a kick over 40 yards all year on grass, though i could be wrong on that. which is exactly why we needed a couple more yards so he didnt have to put his whole leg into itt and his accuracy faulter because o it. i mean it was an amazing kick for his leg strength but it was just to far for him. (and onceagain i am basing this on what i have seen and heard about this as i wasnot alive)

venis2k1
03-05-2008, 12:04 PM
or if kelly and co.could have gotten a few more yards so our pussy legged kicker could make a feild goal

Thats not fair, Norwood was a great kicker for us.

justasportsfan
03-05-2008, 12:05 PM
which is exactly why we needed a couple more yards so he didnt have to put his whole leg into itt and his accuracy faulter because o it. i mean it was an amazing kick for his leg strength but it was just to far for him. (and onceagain i am basing this on what i have seen and heard about this as i wasnot alive)
the team shouldn't left the game in the hands(leg) of the kicker. They should've blown them away.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 12:08 PM
Thats not fair, Norwood was a great kicker for us. im not saying he wasnt just saying that he didnt have the leg strength for our O to let him kick from that far away

Bill Brasky
03-05-2008, 12:08 PM
the team shouldn't left the game in the hands(leg) of the kicker. They should've blown them away.

truer words never spoken.

VeggieMan14
03-05-2008, 12:08 PM
the team shouldn't left the game in the hands(leg) of the kicker. They should've blown them away. exactly

PECKERWOOD
03-05-2008, 01:31 PM
If we draft Calais Campbell in the 2nd we have a shot to be more balanced all around than Bruce's D! Only if we could teleport Marcus Stroud back to the early 90's when we faced the Cowboys.. I wonder if Emmitt would have tried running up the middle so much with Stroud there?