Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

[Mitchell55]

Or any one else on the 90s line for that matter. We had a great OL and at least one of them should eventually be a canidate for the HOF.

[chubluv]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

I hope it does happen . Its a possibility, but I dont think it will happen.

[RockStar36]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

It would be nice but I don't think it will happen. Hell, Andre Reed can't even get in right now.

[Ron Burgundy]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Hull deserves consideration. The fact that Reed hasn't gotten in yet is a joke.

[im4bflo]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

I think HULL for sure, but first Andre, come on!

[YardRat]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Hull should...he was the only constant on the line throughout the glory years, really.

[djjimkelly]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

kent hull should be a lock

[Scumbag College]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

It's tough enough for tackles to get into the HOF, much less interior lineman.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

You have to be especially dominant in the era you play in to make the Hall. It's extremely hard as lineman to get name recognition mostly because when you're doing your job and doing it well your name isn't mentioned.

Lineman mainly only get mentioned when they make mistakes.

I don't think anyone on the glory years team on the o-line screams out dominant player. Will Shields was a dominant Guard for the Chiefs and I don't think he'll make the HOF.

[scott51]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Kent Hull DEFINATELY deserves to be in the HOF, Jim Ritcher I think should eventually but this is the order for our OL in the HOF

Kent Hull
Howard Ballard
Will Wolford
Jim Ritcher

[blackonyx89]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Hull deserves consideration. The fact that Reed hasn't gotten in yet is a joke.

It ain't right. Vote Reed in NOW!!! Hull should go in as well.

[BADTHINGSMAN]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Reed and Hull deffinitly..

[Bone]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Time will tell, Hull and Ballard in my opinion.

[TedMock]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

As good as those lines were, I think Kent Hull is the only one who is deserving of the HOF. He was a very intelligent player and handled his opposition with relative ease.

[bocephuz]

Re: Should Kent Hull or Jim Ritcher be considered for the HOF?

Kent Hull had one of the most challenging roles in the history of the NFL... being the center of the K Gun offense. He clearly did a fantastic job as evidenced by his QB, RB and possibly two of his WR going to the Hall of Fame. He made everyone around him better. That fact alone should merit him consideration.