Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chubluv
    BillsZone bowling team MVP
    • Jan 2003
    • 11565

    Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

    Lets just say its the truth. What do we feel about 6 years 22 mil?


    We are in 5th place
    Clump is on the IR
    Chubluv average is 167
    Yaz average is 179[/B]




    BDZ
    Become a member of BDZ !!!!

  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86147

    #2
    Re: Bryant Johnson Yardbarker Rumor Central

    Originally posted by chubluv
    Lets just say its the truth. What do we feel about 6 years 22 mil?
    I think it's more than fair, for both sides, especially considering if we draft a WR at #11 it's going to cost more than that, most likely.

    Last year Calvin Johnson got 6 yrs, 64mil...Ted Ginn 5yrs 21.8mil...Marshawn (at #12) 5 yrs 19mil.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

    Comment

    • Dr. Lecter
      Zero for Zero!
      • Mar 2003
      • 67930

      #3
      Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

      Put back into the main forum as per YR request.
      Originally posted by mysticsoto
      Lecter is right in everything he said.

      Comment

      • Tatonka
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 21289

        #4
        Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

        its fair.. as long as it is back loaded and pays only if he produces.. hackett would be less with more upside.
        "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

        Comment

        • YardRat
          Well, lookie here...
          • Dec 2004
          • 86147

          #5
          Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

          Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
          Put back into the main forum as per YR request.
          Thanks, Doc.
          YardRat Wall of Fame
          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

          Comment

          • YardRat
            Well, lookie here...
            • Dec 2004
            • 86147

            #6
            Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

            Originally posted by Tatonka
            its fair.. as long as it is back loaded and pays only if he produces.. hackett would be less with more upside.
            More risk, also, and I'm not convinced he'd be looking for less.
            YardRat Wall of Fame
            #56 DARRYL TALLEY
            #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

            Comment

            • X-Era
              What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
              • Feb 2005
              • 27670

              #7
              Re: Bryant Johnson Yardbarker Rumor Central

              Originally posted by chubluv
              Lets just say its the truth. What do we feel about 6 years 22 mil?
              3.6? umm yeah. I expect him to sign for 4-5 mill per. I think thats a bargain.

              BTW, Im merely answering your question not saying I think that offer is real... yet

              Comment

              • mikemac2001
                is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
                • Mar 2003
                • 4574

                #8
                Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                Yes i would take that deal think its fair

                MUCK
                FIAMI

                Comment

                • chernobylwraiths
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 41838

                  #9
                  Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                  No freaking way. ONLY if as Tatonka suggests and it is very backloaded would I like that deal. I don't think that would be the case as guaranteed money is what all free agents are looking for. This guy has done NOTHING to warrant such a contract. I thought what Wilford got was overpaid but closer to what I would pay.

                  Comment

                  • YardRat
                    Well, lookie here...
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 86147

                    #10
                    Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                    Wilford got 13mil over 4, or an average of 3.25/year. 3.66/yr really isn't that much different especially if the upfront money is similar and (most likely) the bigger numbers come in the later years.
                    YardRat Wall of Fame
                    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                    Comment

                    • TigerJ
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 22575

                      #11
                      Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                      The size of the contract (if true) is a bargain for the Bills. The length of the contract is great IF it doesn't have a huge signing bonus. If Bryant were to come in and not be very effective, it would be painful for the Bills to cut him after a couple years.
                      Last edited by TigerJ; 03-10-2008, 08:04 AM.
                      I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                      I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                      Comment

                      • Bert102176
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 3742

                        #12
                        Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                        I think that's fair
                        lets go BUFFALO lets go BUFFALO

                        Comment

                        • Mitchy moo
                          Roways rooking ahread!
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 18380

                          #13
                          Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                          A bargain.

                          Comment

                          • yordad
                            Registered User
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 11867

                            #14
                            Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                            Yes, it would be a fair deal, IMO.
                            "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

                            "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

                            "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

                            "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

                            "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

                            Comment

                            • Philagape
                              WIN NOW
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 19432

                              #15
                              Re: Is 6 yrs/$22 millions for Johnson OK?

                              Under cash to cap it wouldn't be backloaded, right? Isn't that the opposite of cash to cap? Under that kind of a deal, if he tanks, we can cut him at any time with no penalty. As long as it doesn't keep us from our priority extensions, I'm fine with it.
                              "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

                              "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

                              2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
                              2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X