WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

[tampabay25690]

I know most of the people on here think that the BILLS will pick a WR in the 1st round. My question to you is shouldn't we get the BEST player available.

I know the BILLS need a #2 WR to go next to Lee. I know Malcomb Kelly, and Devin Thomas are good players but I think they are a reach at the 11 spot. Knowing JAURON is a DEFENSIVE minded coach do you see him passing over a PASS RUSHING DE in HARVEY!!! A CB like MIKE JENKINS, Leodis McKelvin, or maybe even a stud like KEITH RIVERS ( I think he will be gone anyway).

TO beat the PATRIOTS in this division we need to add some good talent in our secondary and our pass rush. IT will be so hard to pass up some DEFENSIVE guy that can help this team right away. IM not saying we shouldnt go offense but I think that should wait till the 2nd ROUND!!!!!!!!!! I think a guy like Early Doucet, or even Manningham will be there, don't be surprsied if 1 of the top WR slips as well I think it will be KELLY and his knee injuries.........

LATER!!!!

[DrGraves]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

umm because we don't have any fricken good wr's????

[Philagape]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

I'm so sick of the word reach. If a player successfully fills a need, and he wouldn't have been there at the team's next pick, it's not a reach. And that won't be known for years.
Another reason why it's irrelevant now is because all it's based on is media mock drafts, and who gives a crap about that. They don't know what other teams will do.

[ParanoidAndroid]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

I'm all for Caldwell in the second, but we may have to move up to lock it. He has a chance to be the best in this class.

[Jan Reimers]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

I'm so sick of the word reach. If a player successfully fills a need, and he wouldn't have been there at the team's next pick, it's not a reach. And that won't be known for years.
Another reason why it's irrelevant now is because all it's based on is media mock drafts, and who gives a crap about that. They don't know what other teams will do.

I agree. And there are no sure things in any draft, particularly when you're out of the top ten. I can't figure out why McKelvin, Jenkins and DRC are presumed to be locks, while Kelly and Thomas are reaches.

[yordad]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

How do you deem something to be a reach? I can think of a few different ways. What do you think of when you say "reach"?

They would have been available much later?
The career they go onto have?
Where they are at in terms of BPA?

[patmoran2006]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

WHY is devin thomas or malcom kelly a reach?

[Philagape]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

WHY is devin thomas or malcom kelly a reach?

Because the mock draft at www.wehaveourownsitesowe'reexperts.com had him going five spots later

[yordad]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

WHY is devin thomas or malcom kelly a reach?

That is basically what I am asking. I guess my wording was a little too wordy.

[coastal]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

Devin Thomas is top 10 talent.

[tampabay25690]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

Devin Thomas is top 10 talent.

MAYBE he is like a few of u said you never know.

I think the people that know football and I have a friend that is a scout for the NFL has said there is not a WR that is worth a top 10....But probably in the top 20......He thinks the BILLS will go Defense but definitely could go WR if they feel WR will go fast...

I KNOW THE BILLS NEED A WR.........

[Philagape]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

I think the people that know football and I have a friend that is a scout for the NFL has said there is not a WR that is worth a top 10....But probably in the top 20

Good thing we're No. 11

What the hell's the difference anyway? What NFL GM would say "We really like this guy and he fills a need, but we can't take him because the so-called experts say it's seven or eight spots too soon."

[PECKERWOOD]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

They are a reach because chances are we can trade up into the late first and still grab one of them.. This WR class is pretty deep and a good WR should be available with our pick in the 2nd round anyways, so why not take the best player available in the 1st? It wouldn't hurt to have a talented CB that could match up against Moss or a DE that could get inside Brady's head and rattle the young QB's in our division. ( I heard somebody else here say that awhile ago here and I'm not sure who said or I would have given you propers.. )

[Philagape]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

They are a reach because chances are we can trade up into the late first and still grab one of them.. This WR class is pretty deep and a good WR should be available with our pick in the 2nd round anyways, so why not take the best player available in the 1st? It wouldn't hurt to have a talented CB that could match up against Moss or a DE that could get inside Brady's head and rattle the young QB's in our division. ( I heard somebody else here say that awhile ago here and I'm not sure who said or I would have given you propers.. )

Who says chances are we can trade? That's a pretty big variable; it depends on factors the Bills have no control over, like other teams' willingness to trade, other teams making trades, and what they want in exchange.
Never assume what can happen who will be there later on. The Bills should draft according to their board only.

[YardRat]

Re: WHY PICK A WR in Round #1

I'd feel a lot better about going BPA for the entire draft if the FO had done anything at all to address the WR position before we actually pick, but still won't be upset if we go CB, DE, maybe even DT if someone falls into our lap.