I have been very outspoken about not taking a WR at #11. We need not one, but two WRs, so I know how important it is to this team. If there was a clear cut front runner, like Calvin Johnson last year, than I would say absolutely take him at #11.
Here are my main reasons:
1) It will take 8 games before any rookie WR will have an impact. It's the nature of the position. By that time we could be 3-5 and already out of playoff contention. I don't have to tell anybody how our bad starts, year after year, have cost us any chance at a run.
2) There other players in the draft that could have an impact in week 1 that are worthy of a #11 pick. They may help us win games while our 2nd round WR develops.
3) There is no doubt that one of the top 3 WRs that every one keeps talking about will be available in the second round. The Bills have moved up with their 2nd pick 2 years in a row so why not this year, if necessary?
You folks can't even agree on which WR we take. Sweed, Thomas, Kelly? Some analysts have Doucet and Jackson ranked higher. We are narrowing the position because we want "big".
There are positions on this board where at #11 there is no debate.
After Peterson came off the board there was no debate that Lynch was the next best RB on the board. Period. You can't say this at WR.
Here are my main reasons:
1) It will take 8 games before any rookie WR will have an impact. It's the nature of the position. By that time we could be 3-5 and already out of playoff contention. I don't have to tell anybody how our bad starts, year after year, have cost us any chance at a run.
2) There other players in the draft that could have an impact in week 1 that are worthy of a #11 pick. They may help us win games while our 2nd round WR develops.
3) There is no doubt that one of the top 3 WRs that every one keeps talking about will be available in the second round. The Bills have moved up with their 2nd pick 2 years in a row so why not this year, if necessary?
You folks can't even agree on which WR we take. Sweed, Thomas, Kelly? Some analysts have Doucet and Jackson ranked higher. We are narrowing the position because we want "big".
There are positions on this board where at #11 there is no debate.
After Peterson came off the board there was no debate that Lynch was the next best RB on the board. Period. You can't say this at WR.
Comment