so what are we looking for in a #2 wr? a tall, sure-handed wr who can get open and be a redzone threat? well i dont see how his stock has changed at all since tuesday. so what if he ran slower than he expected. so what if he got ticked off due to his "poor performance"? ok seriously, we have 1 workout to base our opinions off of (if you want to base yours from that). im sick of hearing that he wont be able to play well because of what he timed once, or because he has such bad knees. such horrible knees that he's missed all but ZERO games if my studies are correct.
now i am no where near as hardcore in scouting as many people here, nor do i claim to be. but seriously, to degrade a player so much due to one bad day and an outburst of frustration since the last time he's actually played football is just crazy to me. the same vice-versa. look at drc. many here are touting him as being a beast CB, which i will not refute because i dont think him being bad, but its basically the same deal. he played well in the bowl, scouted and tested well, etc. however from reading he quite often got burned by wr's who really weren't very good. but im not taking away that he might be good.
all im saying is that i hate putting so much thought into testing rather than field production, which is where i feel kelly ranks better than thomas. kelly showed us for a few years he can be very good and that he possesses very good hands. that is i think MUCH more important than times.
so with that, rant away:)
now i am no where near as hardcore in scouting as many people here, nor do i claim to be. but seriously, to degrade a player so much due to one bad day and an outburst of frustration since the last time he's actually played football is just crazy to me. the same vice-versa. look at drc. many here are touting him as being a beast CB, which i will not refute because i dont think him being bad, but its basically the same deal. he played well in the bowl, scouted and tested well, etc. however from reading he quite often got burned by wr's who really weren't very good. but im not taking away that he might be good.
all im saying is that i hate putting so much thought into testing rather than field production, which is where i feel kelly ranks better than thomas. kelly showed us for a few years he can be very good and that he possesses very good hands. that is i think MUCH more important than times.
so with that, rant away:)
Comment