If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
They just were talking about who may possibly be the biggest busts in the draft...one guy picked Devin Thomas because of his lack of play time and another guy chose Malcom Kelly because of his slow 40 time and his attitude.
Interesting...if the Bills swing and miss on a WR that high, or at any spot, it'll haunt us for years to come. We NEED a productive WR...I hope they choose wisely....
Thomas has the speed and size to make it. I don't see him being a bust, but he'll take some time to develope at the NFL level.
Kelly, as high as I was on him shouldn't be drafted in round #1... Too many concerns. Sweed barely played in 2007 and really doesn't seem very impressive in highlight reels. I'm surprised Sweed is not mentioned as bust material.
Hardy is the guy who I believe can be effective early on. His extreme height and jumping ability causes instant match up problems. He might take time to fully develope but his red zone, everyones covered jump ball ability should be utilizeable from day 1.
Nelson in round #2 or rd #3 could be the real gem as a possesion WR IMO.
4. Jordy Nelson, WR Kansas State Ultra-productive in his senior year no matter who covered him or what any defense tried to do, Nelson blew up into an unstoppable machine any time he touched the ball. While he's not going to blow past anyone and he's not as physical as his size might show, but he has functional speed and can separate when needed. Outside of a serious injury, there's no bust potential whatsoever. He plays hurt, has nice hands, and can be used in a variety of ways. He'll have a ten-year career as a complimentary receiver. If he goes to a team with a star No. 1, he'll be outstanding. CFN Projection: Second To Third Round
Thomas has the speed and size to make it. I don't see him being a bust, but he'll take some time to develope at the NFL level.
Kelly, as high as I was on him shouldn't be drafted in round #1... Too many concerns. Sweed barely played in 2007 and really doesn't seem very impressive in highlight reels. I'm surprised Sweed is not mentioned as bust material.
Hardy is the guy who I believe can be effective early on. His extreme height and jumping ability causes instant match up problems. He might take time to fully develope but his red zone, everyones covered jump ball ability should be utilizeable from day 1.
Nelson in round #2 or rd #3 could be the real gem as a possesion WR IMO.
i agree 100% with everything you said.. and if you listen to modrack talk about the wrs.. im telling you.. he was beaming over hardy.. i noticed it instantly.. he said that hardy creates mismatch problems with everyone he faces.. no one can go up as high as him. he is EXACTLY what we need. if we were to add nelson too.. wow.
evans, hardy, reed, rosco, neslon.
sick.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Yes, but it's an ESPN prediction, ergo it won't happen
"The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."
Ronald Reagan
40th president of US (1911 - 2004)
Basically if we want production it has to be Hardy
36 touchdowns in 33 games despite being double/triple covered.
2007
Thomas 13 games 79catches 1260yds 8TD
Sweed 7games 19catches 306yds 3TD
Kelly 14games 49catches 821yds 9TD HARDY 13games 79catches 1125yds 16TD
2006
Thomas 10games 6catches 90yds 1TD
Sweed 13games 46catches 801yds 12TD
Kelly 14games 62catches 993yds 10TD HARDY 10games 51catches 772yds 10TD
2005
Thomas 11games 33catches 674yds 5TD
Sweed 11games 23catches 263yds 0TD
Kelly 11games 33catches 471yds 2TD HARDY 10games 61catches 893yds 10TD
Hardy has simply caught more catches for more yardage and more TD production than all the others. He has more TD than Thomas and Sweed .... combined !!!!!
Thomas is a one season wonder who has as much chance of being Robert Meacham as he has of being Dwayne Bowe
Comment