This is kind of impressive

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86191

    This is kind of impressive

    I printed out the individual player rankings for the draft from this site...



    ...and used it as a guide as the draft progressed. Through the first two rounds...

    4 QB's taken, they had them ranked 1 thru 4.
    7 RB's, 1 thru 7.
    0 FB's.
    10 WR's, 1-4, 6-8, 12-13, 15 gone. 5, 9-11, 14 still on the board.
    4 TE's, 1-4.
    7 OT's, 1-6, 8 gone.
    2 OG's, 1-2.
    1 C, 2.
    8 DE's, 1-8.
    4 DT's, 1-4.
    2 OLB's, 1 and 6.
    2 ILB's, 1 and 3.
    10 CB's-1-6, 9-10, 14, 19.
    2 S's-1-2.

    As far as first day picks go, they absolutely nailed (from a ranking standpoint, anyway) 7 out of 14 positions, eight if you count FB's. They were off by one player for three positions, with only WR (5 of top 15 still on board), CB (9 of nineteen still left) and OLB (only two taken, so not really a fair sample) being 'off' by more than a single player.

    11 positions out of 14 taken off the board generally how they had them ranked.

    Pretty credible source, IMO.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
  • Meathead
    Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
    • Jul 2002
    • 21349

    #2
    Re: This is kind of impressive

    wow that seems impossibly accurate

    id like to see how they did in other years to see if this year was just a fluke
    One set of rules for all in the beloved community

    Comment

    Working...
    X