Owen Schmitt in the 4th??

[venis2k1]

Do you go Schmitt in the 4th, or is TE still too much of a need??

[Dr. Lecter]

You take the BPA in the 4th. You don't make jumps due to need.

[coastal]

Mike McGlynn for my money if he is there.

[kernowboy]

McGlynn is good as he can C/G and is a LS
Schmitt would be good

But this draft is a little crazy so BPA

[Bert102176]

well we have 2 picks right so Schmitt and Doucet if they are there
but the way the Bills are drafting I doubt they will get them if they are there cause they need to remove heads from their sphincters

[venis2k1]

You take the BPA in the 4th. You don't make jumps due to need.

Yes, clearly we should draft a 3rd string RB over a FB or TE with the potential to make an immediate impact. :rolleyes:

[LifetimeBillsFan]

I have to go TE with the next pick. A good blocking FB can be gotten later (Felton, Furman)

[Michael82]

I'd take one of the top FBs with our 4th round comp pick. :up:

[Don't Panic]

Will Scmitt last til our next pick?

[Tatonka]

there is a large range of opinion on schmitt.. same with keller.. they could be there in the next round or 2. who knows.

[Don't Panic]

I could see Pittsburgh grabbing Shmitt right before us. If we get him, day 2 just got a lot better.

[Michael82]

Sweet! Pitt didn't take him. Now it's only Philly, who already has a good FB. :up:

[yordad]

You take the BPA in the 4th. You don't make jumps due to need.I believe this idea was wildly spread so that the GM doesn't offend the incumbent. What are they supposed to say, "Yeah, we reached a little for a TE, but only because ours are junk"?

You take the player that would have the greatest impact. This isn't always the BPA. What good is the BPA is he never touches the field because he plays a position we have depth in?

And, if you upgrade a starter from a 5.5 to a 6, is that better the a 1 to a 5? I don't think so.