I WANT OWEN SCHMITT THREAD

[Bone]

Trade up back into the 5th ground and draft him Buffalo!

[Nighthawk]

Now that would make sense...I'd like that.

[historypete]

I'd rather save the pick for the punter we'll draft in the 6th.

[Slim]

Schmitt or Hillis.

[Mr. Miyagi]

I'm in for Schmitt. Trade up for him.

[Nighthawk]

Schmitt or Hillis.

yes, I forgot about Hillis...I'd be Ok with that also.

[Bone]

**** seattle got him, hes going to injure 1 of our guys on opening day

[kernowboy]

he's just gone to the Seahawks

[Marvelous]

Trent loves dumpoffs so it makes sense to get him a FB target... Makes sense to us atleast but they must be thinking UDFA.

[Rhettoric]

So much for Owen Schmidt, we will at least get to see him this year when we play Seattle : (

[Nighthawk]

Oh well...easy come, easy go.

[coastal]

too bad... we got Mr. Fine.

[Marvelous]

frakkin-A. I really wanted that kid.. Do we even have a FB on the roster? Cisleak/Neufeld just aren't cutting it...I never valued FB at all. Even when we had Gash, but i could see one having meaning on 3rd downs.....bah!

[yordad]

frakkin-A. I really wanted that kid.. Do we even have a FB on the roster? Cisleak/Neufeld just aren't cutting it...I never valued FB at all. Even when we had Gash, but i could see one having meaning on 3rd downs.....bah!It seems some people think we might as well feild 10 people. If a guy is on the field a significant portion of the game, or any portion really, then it is important. I wanted him too, man.

If we plan to use a FB, and we need a red zone target, and we plan to faze out the H-back, then why did we reach for a H-back when arguably the best receiving TE and arguably best all around FB in the draft were both still available?