Theory on why we disregarded the offense

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jamze132
    Don’t hate…
    • Jun 2003
    • 29360

    Theory on why we disregarded the offense

    I have a theory about why the Bills pretty much neglected the offense during FA and the draft. I think they believe our offense is already much better than they have shown, meaning they have under-achieved under Fairchild.

    I have racked my brain on this for a while now and have came to this conclusion. They must have really considered Fairchild the biggest reason why the offense sucked ass the last couple of years. I don't know if I completely agree with my own theory but it might make sense. I see no other reason why we completely neglected to improve our offense, with the exception of Hardy in RD2.

    Maybe the FO thinks that Schonert is really going to get the best from what we already have. I just hope what we have has the ability to get better, especially since they are doing it without any additional help this entire offseason.
  • theanswer74
    Registered User
    • Apr 2004
    • 784

    #2
    Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

    They really didnt forget about the offense. They got a WR many people wanted them to get.

    They just didnt get a TE. The offense is loaded with talent, they need to get good QB play now.

    Comment

    • YardRat
      Well, lookie here...
      • Dec 2004
      • 86235

      #3
      Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

      If they think we don't need help at TE and C, especially, I'm really disappointed.
      YardRat Wall of Fame
      #56 DARRYL TALLEY
      #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

      Comment

      • Typ0
        honey pie
        • Jul 2002
        • 32593

        #4
        Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

        they don't have a clue what they have and they won't until the end of the season when we get a better look at TE. We have had crappy QB play and with that so goes your offense.

        Comment

        • shelby
          The Vanilla *****
          • Jul 2002
          • 48489

          #5
          Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

          i am disappointed with the Fine pick, but i have a bad habit of assuming that the gentlemen at OBD know more than i do....

          Comment

          • Elminster
            #1 Kelsay Fan
            • Oct 2006
            • 928

            #6
            Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

            I'm concerned that little will change: that we're going to keep the safety on the offense when we get into a "shoot-out" with the Pats. My doubts about DJ are many and deeply-rooted...
            Good riddance Fairchild. Of course, the knowledge of your departure will only make TE more hateable than the typical Bills QB. Good luck, hope we don't mess you up like JP.

            Comment

            • Marvelous
              Registered User
              • Feb 2004
              • 2226

              #7
              Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

              Originally posted by shelby
              i am disappointed with the Fine pick, but i have a bad habit of assuming that the gentlemen at OBD know more than i do....
              :rotf:

              thanks dude, i needed that :)
              GO BILLS!!! NE
              Magical Trevor

              Comment

              • Night Train
                Retired - On Several Levels
                • Jul 2005
                • 33117

                #8
                Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                Originally posted by jamze132
                I have a theory about why the Bills pretty much neglected the offense during FA and the draft. I think they believe our offense is already much better than they have shown, meaning they have under-achieved under Fairchild.

                I have racked my brain on this for a while now and have came to this conclusion. They must have really considered Fairchild the biggest reason why the offense sucked ass the last couple of years. I don't know if I completely agree with my own theory but it might make sense. I see no other reason why we completely neglected to improve our offense, with the exception of Hardy in RD2.

                Maybe the FO thinks that Schonert is really going to get the best from what we already have. I just hope what we have has the ability to get better, especially since they are doing it without any additional help this entire offseason.
                I agree.

                C would have been nice but all were smaller than Fowler.

                I'll be interested to see if the TE Fine offers something.
                Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                Comment

                • chernobylwraiths
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 41838

                  #9
                  Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                  Originally posted by Marvelous
                  :rotf:

                  thanks dude, i needed that :)


                  dude

                  Comment

                  • evol4276
                    Registered User
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 1333

                    #10
                    Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                    we didnt neglect the offense! we picked 2 wr's a te, a rb and a lineman so far. ok so they didnt get who you guys wanted but IT GOT OUR NEEDS FILLED

                    Comment

                    • LifetimeBillsFan
                      All-Pro Zoner
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 4946

                      #11
                      Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                      I'm just wondering if they are figuring that, with all of the TEs that were going to be drafted taken in this draft class, there are going to be a number of TEs getting cut once training camp starts, including some vets who will be able to step in and play right away and not need time to develop.

                      They may feel that either Anderson or Johnson will give them all of the deep receiving threat that they need at the position and that, rather than spend a pick on a kid like F.Davis or Rucker or Keller, who can catch but is going to need time to develop as a blocker, they would be better off picking up a vet who may not be a great receiver, but can give them the blocking that they are going to need.

                      FYI: It appears that C.Baker of the Jets is already upset that, even though he is the starter, he will be only the third highest paid TE on the team behind Keller and B.Franks. His agent is making noises about wanting the team to either up his salary or trade him.... Baker may be the first TE to let it be known that he feels that way, but he may not be the last--although the others may not be willing to take such a public stance just yet....

                      Once they missed out on Bennett (or perhaps Finley) the Bills may have just decided that they would wait for situations like this to start to shake out and see if they could pick up a guy who could do what Gaines did for them last season (remember, they got him as a street free agent).
                      Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. And, thus it was that they surrendered their freedom; not with a bang, but without even a whimper.

                      Comment

                      • losman420
                        Registered User
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 1187

                        #12
                        Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                        Originally posted by shelby
                        i am disappointed with the Fine pick, but i have a bad habit of assuming that the gentlemen at OBD know more than i do....
                        LOL your not alone shelby, I have the same bad habit.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                          LTBF, I actually wondered that two. With Franks and Keller, Baker isn't going to be very happy at all.

                          Comment

                          • jamze132
                            Don’t hate…
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 29360

                            #14
                            Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                            Originally posted by theanswer74
                            They really didnt forget about the offense. They got a WR many people wanted them to get.

                            They just didnt get a TE. The offense is loaded with talent, they need to get good QB play now.
                            I mentioned that they got Hardy. And the point I made in my post was for the entire offseason, to include the draft. Tell me again how many players we brought in for the offense?

                            Comment

                            • jamze132
                              Don’t hate…
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 29360

                              #15
                              Re: Theory on why we disregarded the offense

                              Originally posted by evol4276
                              we didnt neglect the offense! we picked 2 wr's a te, a rb and a lineman so far. ok so they didnt get who you guys wanted but IT GOT OUR NEEDS FILLED
                              So throughout FA and the draft we got one potential starter on offense. We didn't get jack during FA. And when you talk about filling needs with 6th and 7th rounders, I tend to stop listening. A couple of those won't even make the roster.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X