Just read some more information about the James Hardy alleged incident.
There does seem to be a lot of 2+2 = 27.
It seems the situation that because Hardy has a permit to carry a small handgun and was in a fight with his old man, therefore he must have pulled a gun on him.
Hardy has not been charged with anything.
His father has said there was an argument not altercation and that Hardy did not pull a gun on him.
Only a female witness said he pulled a handgun. She called the police and maybe chose to big it up recognising Hardy as a star. Boring stories do not make money for witnesses to sell. As he has a legal license to carry a gun, might have meant he had the gun on it, but doesn't mean he pulled the gun out on his old man. But the witness could easily have implied he did, so not to feel that she has wasted police time.
I have only heard that this witness said a gun was pulled. No other source seems to have confirmed this.
Maybe fans should put their toys back into the pram?
There does seem to be a lot of 2+2 = 27.
It seems the situation that because Hardy has a permit to carry a small handgun and was in a fight with his old man, therefore he must have pulled a gun on him.
Hardy has not been charged with anything.
His father has said there was an argument not altercation and that Hardy did not pull a gun on him.
Only a female witness said he pulled a handgun. She called the police and maybe chose to big it up recognising Hardy as a star. Boring stories do not make money for witnesses to sell. As he has a legal license to carry a gun, might have meant he had the gun on it, but doesn't mean he pulled the gun out on his old man. But the witness could easily have implied he did, so not to feel that she has wasted police time.
I have only heard that this witness said a gun was pulled. No other source seems to have confirmed this.
Maybe fans should put their toys back into the pram?
Comment