Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86191

    Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2



    A change of hands changes fortune

    Profitability depends on team’s debt load


    The Buffalo Bills are one of the National Football League’s most profitable teams, but that could change in a hurry if the team is sold.

    Because Bills owner Ralph Wilson founded the team for a mere $25,000 back in 1959, he doesn’t have to worry about paying off a huge loan to finance the team’s purchase.

    But whoever buys the Bills from Ralph Wilson or his estate will have that worry — and those loan payments could easily turn the franchise from one that makes a nice profit to one that roughly breaks even or worse.

    And that could be the biggest hurdle to keeping the Bills in Buffalo once the team changes hands.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
  • Jan Reimers
    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
    • May 2003
    • 17353

    #2
    Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

    I still can't understand why Ralph doesn't leave the team to his wife, who could let Brandon and his guys run the operation. It would solve the estate tax problem, keep the appreciation ball rolling for his family, and allow the team to continue to be debt free - and profitable.
    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

    Comment

    • Patrick76777
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 17297

      #3
      Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

      Originally posted by Jan Reimers
      I still can't understand why Ralph doesn't leave the team to his wife, who could let Brandon and his guys run the operation. It would solve the estate tax problem, keep the appreciation ball rolling for his family, and allow the team to continue to be debt free - and profitable.

      I've always thought the same thing. She's in her 50's and she's a huge fan of the team.
      Resign our own guys!

      Comment

      • Jan Reimers
        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
        • May 2003
        • 17353

        #4
        Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

        Originally posted by Patrick76777
        I've always thought the same thing. She's in her 50's and she's a huge fan of the team.
        Plus, I read an article in the Buffalo News about the Girls in Sports programs that she started and are held at the fieldhouse, where she said she would love to do more with the local community and to live in Buffalo.
        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

        Comment

        • Historian
          2020-2023 AFC East Champions!
          • Dec 2002
          • 61779

          #5
          Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

          Originally posted by Jan Reimers
          Plus, I read an article in the Buffalo News about the Girls in Sports programs that she started and are held at the fieldhouse, where she said she would love to do more with the local community and to live in Buffalo.
          I used to volunteer for the Women Understanding Football Clinic every fall.

          That's how I got to meet Jeff Nixon.

          He was instructing the women on D Line and pass rush....and I was his QB tackling dummy.

          Comment

          • Don't Panic
            All-Pro Zoner
            • Dec 2005
            • 4227

            #6
            Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

            “Our sole focus — our sole focus — is to keep this franchise financially sound in Western New York,” said Russ Brandon
            I like to hear that, whether he means it 100% or not, at least he's saying it.

            Ralph has made it clear that there will be a sale of the team when he dies... I'd like to see it stay in the family as well but it isn't in the cards apparently. I still think they need to look into what Green Bay has done and sell the team off as "shares of stock". The Galisanos of the area would have first crack so we can make sure someone doesn't come in and try to buy controlling share and take the team elsewhere, then the locals (they'd put a provision in that said you had to live in Erie, Niagara, Monroe, Genessee county, etc. or something like that), then, after we've established local majority ownership, open it up to anyone.

            We've talked about this before... assuming the team sold for $800 million, you could make 4 million shares of stock available. That's $200 a share at the "IPO". Let the local managing partners buy their chunk, then the fans. I know I'd buy a share just for the claim of being part owner of the Bills. If the initial investment was $360 million (local business leaders), do you think there are a quarter million people living in WNY who would spend $200 to own part of the team? I do. They spend a lot more than that on average in the course of a single season. That gets us over 50%. That means all decisions involving the team are being made by a majority that has a vested interest in the Greater Buffalo area. If we can get a better turnout than this, it simply means more local ownership. You could even have the Canadians get involved to guarantee their one preseason and one regular season game a year (which I'd be more than willing to do if it meant keeping us in Buffalo).

            That leaves $390 million, or 1.95 million shares (max.), to be bought up by anyone else. Considering the success of the league, there would be little problem in selling these off. Find me a consistent roi that can rival the NFL....

            I know it is a lot more complicated than this, but the idea of parttial public ownership should be one that is fully heard when Ralph finally moves on to the nex phase of life.

            Comment

            • Jan Reimers
              Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
              • May 2003
              • 17353

              #7
              Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

              Originally posted by bwbrenton
              I like to hear that, whether he means it 100% or not, at least he's saying it.

              Ralph has made it clear that there will be a sale of the team when he dies... I'd like to see it stay in the family as well but it isn't in the cards apparently. I still think they need to look into what Green Bay has done and sell the team off as "shares of stock". The Galisanos of the area would have first crack so we can make sure someone doesn't come in and try to buy controlling share and take the team elsewhere, then the locals (they'd put a provision in that said you had to live in Erie, Niagara, Monroe, Genessee county, etc. or something like that), then, after we've established local majority ownership, open it up to anyone.

              We've talked about this before... assuming the team sold for $800 million, you could make 4 million shares of stock available. That's $200 a share at the "IPO". Let the local managing partners buy their chunk, then the fans. I know I'd buy a share just for the claim of being part owner of the Bills. If the initial investment was $360 million (local business leaders), do you think there are a quarter million people living in WNY who would spend $200 to own part of the team? I do. They spend a lot more than that on average in the course of a single season. That gets us over 50%. That means all decisions involving the team are being made by a majority that has a vested interest in the Greater Buffalo area. If we can get a better turnout than this, it simply means more local ownership. You could even have the Canadians get involved to guarantee their one preseason and one regular season game a year (which I'd be more than willing to do if it meant keeping us in Buffalo).

              That leaves $390 million, or 1.95 million shares (max.), to be bought up by anyone else. Considering the success of the league, there would be little problem in selling these off. Find me a consistent roi that can rival the NFL....

              I know it is a lot more complicated than this, but the idea of parttial public ownership should be one that is fully heard when Ralph finally moves on to the nex phase of life.
              Current NFL bylaws, as I understand, prohibit public ownership of franchises. That's not to say that Congress, using its anti-trust exemption hammer, couldn't force an exemption for the Bills.
              Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

              Comment

              • Don't Panic
                All-Pro Zoner
                • Dec 2005
                • 4227

                #8
                Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                Current NFL bylaws, as I understand, prohibit public ownership of franchises. That's not to say that Congress, using its anti-trust exemption hammer, couldn't force an exemption for the Bills.
                They do? How did GB get around it? If the anti-trust route needs to be taken, then so be it. It seems we're pretty close to that after spygate anyway.

                Comment

                • ddaryl
                  Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 10714

                  #9
                  Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                  Greenbay is the reason for the NFL rule. They did it, and the NFL quickly nixed any future teasm form doing so soon afterwards.

                  Comment

                  • Jan Reimers
                    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                    • May 2003
                    • 17353

                    #10
                    Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                    Originally posted by bwbrenton
                    They do? How did GB get around it? If the anti-trust route needs to be taken, then so be it. It seems we're pretty close to that after spygate anyway.
                    I believe the bylaws were changed sometime after GB went public.
                    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                    Comment

                    • Dozerdog
                      In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

                      Administrator Emeritus
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 42586

                      #11
                      Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                      The Green Bay Football Corp sold team stock starting in 1920 through 1950. There are 1900 shareowners. No one owns more than 200 shares and there is zero profit made on the shares- all is plowed back into the team and the facilities.

                      The NFL (and all other major pro sports leagues) have since discontinued this practice. Some sports teams have sold novelty stock (The Celtics for one a few years ago) but for the most part it is worthless.

                      Comment

                      • Dozerdog
                        In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

                        Administrator Emeritus
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 42586

                        #12
                        Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                        The last thing you want is a sports league with 250,000 owners. Talk about a big mess.

                        Comment

                        • Dr. Lecter
                          Zero for Zero!
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 67938

                          #13
                          Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                          Originally posted by Dozerdog
                          The last thing you want is a sports league with 250,000 owners. Talk about a big mess.
                          We would have to call each other cheap,old and senile and criticize ourselves without justification.
                          Originally posted by mysticsoto
                          Lecter is right in everything he said.

                          Comment

                          • Dr. Lecter
                            Zero for Zero!
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 67938

                            #14
                            Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                            Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                            I still can't understand why Ralph doesn't leave the team to his wife, who could let Brandon and his guys run the operation. It would solve the estate tax problem, keep the appreciation ball rolling for his family, and allow the team to continue to be debt free - and profitable.
                            Perhaps she likes being an owner's wife, but is not interested in ownership itself?

                            I don't know, but that is certainly possible.
                            Originally posted by mysticsoto
                            Lecter is right in everything he said.

                            Comment

                            • Don't Panic
                              All-Pro Zoner
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 4227

                              #15
                              Re: Bills Battle for Profits...Part 2

                              Green Bay had the vision to do it right, and after all of these years, no matter how smal their market gets, they're not going anywhere. It's unfortunate if we can't work out some 'modern day' version of their blueprint.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X