Just saw it now on BB.com... Spencer Johnson is the starter now ahead of John McCargo. I find it kind of weird that they made that change so early in the off-season.
Interesting depth chart change...
Collapse
X
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
McCargo is a good, developing young player. If Johnson is actually better, that makes our DT rotation even stronger.
However, I wouldn't put too much stock in May's Depth Chart.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
-
👍 6
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
It's good fodder. But they're going to rotate those guys a lot anyway.Buffalo Bills Now! and NFL Now! podcasts
And every Saturday at 11am on WGR
"A good name is more desirable than great riches, and high esteem is better than silver and gold."
Class Character Commitment Consistency Courage
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by Jan ReimersMcCargo is a good, developing young player. If Johnson is actually better, that makes our DT rotation even stronger.
However, I wouldn't put too much stock in May's Depth Chart.
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by pinkdogg32poz was listed as the backup all last spring, and started day 1. just a way for the coaches to keep their egos down, perhaps?
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by MahdiYeah I wouldnt put too much stock into it either but its strange that they would move a returning player who was slated to be the starter so quickly of the starting line only after OTA week 1.
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by justasportsfanMy inside source told me the webmaster is bored and screwing around with the site.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
If Spencer Johnson wins the starting DT job ahead of McCargo, I think it's safe to say it's yet another blown pick in the '06 draft. First Youboty, then McCargo...and Whitner isn't yet shown he was worth the 8th overall...that draft class looks weaker and weaker every year...but I'll give it til the end of this season to have my full critique.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by raphael120If Spencer Johnson wins the starting DT job ahead of McCargo, I think it's safe to say it's yet another blown pick in the '06 draft. First Youboty, then McCargo...and Whitner isn't yet shown he was worth the 8th overall...that draft class looks weaker and weaker every year...but I'll give it til the end of this season to have my full critique.
Like you, I'll wait until the end of camp to see how Youboty develops, but I think Whitner will hit his stride big time this year when he doesn't have to spend most of his time in the box trying to stop the run.
See how much nicer it is when the glass is half full?Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
I still say Spencer Johnson was a bigger pick up then many have given it.
He could very well be a starter from day 1. The fact is he played behind 2 probowl DT's in Minny, and the consensus has been Minny's D never lost a step when Spencer came in.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Interesting depth chart change...
Originally posted by MahdiJust saw it now on BB.com... Spencer Johnson is the starter now ahead of John McCargo. I find it kind of weird that they made that change so early in the off-season.
http://www.buffalobills.com/depth_chart/index.html
Do you really think that James Hardy will be the 6th WR behind guys like Justin Jenkins and Scott Mayle as the depth chart indicates? These guys likely won't even survive the first cut in training camp.
Also The Digi is listed behind Poz and clearly that's an error as well.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment