Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Romes
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 5764

    Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case




    Interesting stuff. He thinks Lynch is being singled out. He says Lynch has every right not to talk and not to incriminate himself or anybody else. Not talking is not obstruction of justice. Obstruction requires a physical act.

    Not to make excuses for Lynch but the lawyer does point out that there are a ton of things that could change the circumstances of this event that we just don't know.
    Originally posted by paladin warrior
    RALPH is drove me nut.
  • Bill Brasky
    Drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls
    • Jan 2004
    • 66218

    #2
    Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

    Not to make excuses for Lynch but the lawyer does point out that there are a ton of things that could change the circumstances of this event that we just don't know.
    -----

    nonesense, let's just keep speculating!

    Comment

    • DraftBoy
      Administrator
      • Jul 2002
      • 107452

      #3
      Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

      Liar!
      COMING SOON...
      Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
      We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

      Comment

      • don137
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 7720

        #4
        Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

        Sounds like a lawyer being a lawyer....

        Comment

        • Romes
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 5764

          #5
          Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

          Originally posted by jfreeman
          -----

          nonesense, let's just keep speculating!
          good point. speculation is more fun.
          Originally posted by paladin warrior
          RALPH is drove me nut.

          Comment

          • THATHURMANATOR
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 69112

            #6
            Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

            Originally posted by jfreeman
            -----

            nonesense, let's just keep speculating!
            YES I WANT LYNCH OFF MY TEAM....

            Comment

            • Bill Brasky
              Drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls
              • Jan 2004
              • 66218

              #7
              Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

              Originally posted by Romes
              good point. speculation is more fun.
              seems to be working great for the oil industry

              Comment

              • Romes
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 5764

                #8
                Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                Originally posted by don137
                Sounds like a lawyer being a lawyer....
                Yeah he does...but he is right...
                Originally posted by paladin warrior
                RALPH is drove me nut.

                Comment

                • justasportsfan
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 71579

                  #9
                  Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                  you mean the cops want to screw over the bills so they move to LA which could affect revenue in the buffalo area?

                  I doubt that lawyer has the facts about what happened either. Somone needs to contact him and have him start posting here.
                  sacrifice1
                  https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                  Comment

                  • Jan Reimers
                    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                    • May 2003
                    • 17353

                    #10
                    Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                    I know everything is so complex these days, and there are so many ramifications and legal shades of gray, but I'm still not convinced that if you're innocent, you need to hide behind a lawyer and say nothing.

                    If you're innocent, why not simply tell the truth?
                    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                    Comment

                    • Romes
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 5764

                      #11
                      Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                      Originally posted by justasportsfan
                      you mean the cops want to screw over the bills so they move to LA which could affect revenue in the buffalo area?

                      I doubt that lawyer has the facts about what happened either.
                      He admitted he didn't have the facts in the interview.
                      Originally posted by paladin warrior
                      RALPH is drove me nut.

                      Comment

                      • Mr. Miyagi
                        Lecter's Little *****

                        • Sep 2002
                        • 53616

                        #12
                        Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                        Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                        I know everything is so complex these days, and there are so many ramifications and legal shades of gray, but I'm still not convinced that if you're innocent, you need to hide behind a lawyer and say nothing.

                        If you're innocent, why not simply tell the truth?
                        Because sometimes they can twist your words and use them against you.

                        We're not dealing with "who chopped down my cherry tree" here. We're dealing with a high profile case with a celebrity. Everyone has an agenda, including the DA. The girl probably wants money. The DA office probably wants the spotlight. Everyone's in for something. Why would you say anything to potentially incriminate yourself?

                        Comment

                        • Dujek
                          Hall of Fame Zoner
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 7806

                          #13
                          Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                          Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                          I know everything is so complex these days, and there are so many ramifications and legal shades of gray, but I'm still not convinced that if you're innocent, you need to hide behind a lawyer and say nothing.

                          If you're innocent, why not simply tell the truth?
                          The Guildford 4 tried that and got banged up for 20 years.

                          Admittedly the Buffalo PD is probably not as inept or corrupt as the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad, but you never know.

                          Comment

                          • justasportsfan
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 71579

                            #14
                            Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                            Originally posted by Romes
                            He admitted he didn't have the facts in the interview.

                            WGR was just trying to do what they do.
                            sacrifice1
                            https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                            Comment

                            • patmoran2006
                              Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 19840

                              #15
                              Re: Lawyer on WGR talks about Lynch case

                              Speculation? There is apparently evidence that it was his car that struck the woman. Damange to left front end, car was impounded.. and a video camera on the corner.

                              Maybe speculation as to who was driving, which is probably why no arrest has been made yet. .But speculation as to whether his SUV was involved? LOL, hardly.


                              Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                              Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X