Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Patrick76777
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 17297

    Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

    SIMPLE. BUFFALO IS NOT A 2008 SUPER BOWL CONTENDER.


    Resign our own guys!
  • shelby
    The Vanilla *****
    • Jul 2002
    • 48489

    #2
    Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

    Well, duh. Thanks, Captain Obvious.

    Comment

    • LtBillsFan66
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 35553

      #3
      Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

      Peter King is the scum of the earth.

      Comment

      • madness
        Registered User
        • Apr 2003
        • 13690

        #4
        Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

        Scott needs a wakeup call.

        Comment

        • trapezeus
          Legendary Zoner
          • Oct 2004
          • 19525

          #5
          Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

          PK is just a Boston sports fan who happens to live in jersey and suckle on the NY sports scene to make a living. His articles are only decent because he has access to many of the players. however, he simply does not keep up with each team.

          Regardless if his opinion is correct or not with the bills, PK can not be relied on to make football guesses. He simply gets to the bottom of stories that are in vogue at the moment. Therefore, you isn't a jaws type reporter who watches reels and reels of film and can tell you why a team or player is having success.

          And once favre leaves for good, whenever that is, PK's articles are going to get a whole lot shorter.

          Comment

          • THATHURMANATOR
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 69112

            #6
            Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

            I agree with his assesment 100%.

            Comment

            • Mr. Miyagi
              Lecter's Little *****

              • Sep 2002
              • 53616

              #7
              Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

              It doesn't matter. Who cares what these talking heads think? Tons of them thought Miami with Culpepper was going all the way. None of them even considered the Giants a playoff team last year. Shows what they know.

              Comment

              • DrGraves
                Registered User
                • Mar 2008
                • 2693

                #8
                Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                im sure he said the gmen were not contenders last year...

                Comment

                • SpillerThrills
                  Registered User
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 1922

                  #9
                  Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                  Just remember, last year Miami was going to the Superbowl before the season started!
                  2008-2009 BZHL Champion!
                  2008 Pro Football Pick 'em Champion!
                  2008 Survival Football Co-Champion!
                  2006-2007 3 Star Pick 'em Champion!

                  Comment

                  • Bill Brasky
                    Drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 66218

                    #10
                    Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                    Originally posted by Mr. Miyagi
                    Who cares what these talking heads think?
                    except, of course, when they talk highly of the bills. right?

                    Comment

                    • TigerJ
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 22575

                      #11
                      Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                      I think Buffalo has a real chance to make the playoffs, but a few things have to happen before I start thinking Super Bowl.
                      I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                      I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                      Comment

                      • dplus47
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 671

                        #12
                        Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                        in the piece, king actually said he likes the bills this year, and thinks they can win 9 games. however, he said it was unrealistic to assume they were ahead of NE, SD, Indy, etc. that doesn't strike me as "bashing" at all. the AFC is a bit difficult. it would be a different story in the NFC, but it is what it is...

                        Comment

                        • THATHURMANATOR
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 69112

                          #13
                          Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                          Originally posted by jfreeman
                          except, of course, when they talk highly of the bills. right?
                          Which many have, but I don't think anyone actually believes we are a Super Bowl contendor. I just want this team to play an important game at the end of the season.. That is all I ask!

                          Comment

                          • madness
                            Registered User
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 13690

                            #14
                            Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                            For all the people neglecting to read the article before commenting... this was King's response to the following email.

                            From Scott, of Buffalo: "Just curious, why do you think Brett Favre would veto a trade to Buffalo? The Bills have a solid line, a solid receiver in Lee Evans, a mountain of a rookie receiver to toss it up to in the red zone in James Hardy, a stud back in Marshawn Lynch and two solid slot receivers in Josh Reed and Roscoe Parrish. Along with a much improved defense, the Bills are a definite playoff contender. Why would Favre not want to go there? I would think that the Bills would be the one nixing the trade as they are very confident in second-year man Trent Edwards.''
                            Honestly, Scott, if you had one last hurrah in pro football, and someone suggested that you should go to a team that appears to be on the rise but hasn't made the playoffs in nine years, would you want to go? I am bullish on the Bills and think they might be able to win nine this year. But it's not logical in the current power structure of the AFC to suggest they're ahead of New England, Indy, Jacksonville, San Diego ... and probably not ahead of Pittsburgh or Cleveland either.

                            Comment

                            • Oaf
                              Do you read what you write?
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 6151

                              #15
                              Re: Peter King is not a Bill-iever!

                              The more doubters the better.



                              Oh wait, I agree with him somewhat.

                              If we can't beat Jacksonville or Cleveland this year, barring a Patriot meltdown, we will not see playoffs.
                              Last edited by Oaf; 07-22-2008, 09:16 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X