Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patmoran2006
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
    • Dec 2005
    • 19840

    Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters



    The message sounded all too familiar, a filthy rich athlete whining about not making enough money. Jason Peters’ protest over his contract with the Buffalo Bills didn’t exactly startle an organization that spent years listening to Bruce Smith’s annual blather about feelings of disrespect.

    Bruce’s general approach was complaining about his contract, reminding everyone he was the best defensive end in football, finding reasons to skip large portions of training camp and reporting back to the Bills for the start of the season. It was Bruce being Bruce, greedy and selfish, always taking care of No. 1 before donning No. 78.

    Ralph Wilson has been around the block a few times, knows every pothole on the street. He’s owned the franchise for nearly 50 years. He transformed the Bills from a $30,000 risk into a $760 million empire. He’s had terrific teams and terrible ones. But he always, always, did business on his own terms.

    Obviously, Peters doesn’t know Ralph the way we do. He’s not a man with whom you want to play chicken, especially when he’s driving a tractor-trailer and you’re in a Pinto. Peters isn’t Bruce. He has neither the leverage nor the credentials to bully around the Bills.
    Last edited by JJamezz; 07-28-2008, 08:17 AM.


    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE
  • Romes
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 5764

    #2
    Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

    Originally posted by patmoran2006
    http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/co...ry/401589.html

    The message sounded all too familiar, a filthy rich athlete whining about not making enough money. Jason Peters’ protest over his contract with the Buffalo Bills didn’t exactly startle an organization that spent years listening to Bruce Smith’s annual blather about feelings of disrespect.

    Bruce’s general approach was complaining about his contract, reminding everyone he was the best defensive end in football, finding reasons to skip large portions of training camp and reporting back to the Bills for the start of the season. It was Bruce being Bruce, greedy and selfish, always taking care of No. 1 before donning No. 78.

    Ralph Wilson has been around the block a few times, knows every pothole on the street. He’s owned the franchise for nearly 50 years. He transformed the Bills from a $30,000 risk into a $760 million empire. He’s had terrific teams and terrible ones. But he always, always, did business on his own terms.

    Obviously, Peters doesn’t know Ralph the way we do. He’s not a man with whom you want to play chicken, especially when he’s driving a tractor-trailer and you’re in a Pinto. Peters isn’t Bruce. He has neither the leverage nor the credentials to bully around the Bills.
    I hope Peters reads that.
    Originally posted by paladin warrior
    RALPH is drove me nut.

    Comment

    • Philagape
      WIN NOW
      • Jul 2002
      • 19432

      #3
      Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

      Ralph's "tractor-trailer" will be jackknifed when his QB is killed by a blindside hit allowed by Kirk Chambers.
      Every season Peters loses is one the Bills lose, too.
      "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

      "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

      2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
      2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

      Comment

      • Mr. Pink
        Peterman Sucks!
        • Mar 2006
        • 35303

        #4
        Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

        I completely agree with Gleason at the end of this column.

        Until Peters decides to show up, he can have fun collecting fines. If/when he shows up then he can talk turkey.

        Comment

        • Ickybaluky
          Registered User
          • Jul 2003
          • 8884

          #5
          Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

          Tough talk and the hard line are fine unless the guy misses games. If the Bills want to stare down to see if he will cave, they are playing a dangerous game.

          You can talk all you want about letting him rot, but the fact is if the holdout lasts into the season you are risking the promise of this season and perhaps the confidence of Edwards. Peters is a big part of the Bills and a franchise LT. All it takes is one missed block he would have made and Edwards might be in traction.

          If the Bills want to risk that, more power to them. Maybe Peters can't stand to stay away and comes back before the season. Maybe he just doesn't feel like going through training camp and he will come back in with just the Bills promise that they will deal with his contract at a later date.

          However, if they are wrong and he stays away, their season is at risk. Those are some high stakes.

          Comment

          • shelby
            The Vanilla admin
            • Jul 2002
            • 48489

            #6
            Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

            i think the FO should shut up and pay him.
            Just my opinion.

            Comment

            • OpIv37
              Acid Douching Asswipe
              • Sep 2002
              • 101230

              #7
              Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

              Originally posted by NE39
              Tough talk and the hard line are fine unless the guy misses games. If the Bills want to stare down to see if he will cave, they are playing a dangerous game.

              You can talk all you want about letting him rot, but the fact is if the holdout lasts into the season you are risking the promise of this season and perhaps the confidence of Edwards. Peters is a big part of the Bills and a franchise LT. All it takes is one missed block he would have made and Edwards might be in traction.

              If the Bills want to risk that, more power to them. Maybe Peters can't stand to stay away and comes back before the season. Maybe he just doesn't feel like going through training camp and he will come back in with just the Bills promise that they will deal with his contract at a later date.

              However, if they are wrong and he stays away, their season is at risk. Those are some high stakes.
              Exactly. The Bills have the upper hand financially and can easily hold out longer than he can. In fact they're saving money by getting 15k a day from him (peanuts in the grand scheme of things, but 15k more than what they'd have if he were practicing).

              However, on the field, he has the upper hand. The Bills and Edwards desperately need him. And they know it.

              We'll be lucky to win 5 games without Peters.
              MiKiDo Facebook
              MiKiDo Website

              Comment

              • ddaryl
                Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                • Jan 2005
                • 10714

                #8
                Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                Oh friggin well... It sucks but this is the way it WILL BE.

                Peters has gone about this the wrong way, and there is nothing we can do about it. There is no choice in the matter. You can not let a single player hold a team hostage. Peters at the bare minimum needed to show up at OTA's and prove he was a team leader 1st... Who in their right mind would throw 50+ million at a player who couldn't be bothered to show up.

                and of course Peters should have turned down his extension last year if he wanted to gamble on bigger contract sooner. The Bills had no intention of upping Peters contract 2 years in a row, and I seriously doubt other teams would be playing this much differently.

                Bottom line is Peters can choose to hold out. It will cost him millions... If he holds out for the entire year he still owes the Bills 3 more years plus fines.
                IMHO Peters is just trying to get out of trainnig camp...

                I do think Peters deserves to be paid more, but since he is trying to hold the team hostage I am not on his side at all.

                Comment

                • RockStar36
                  Dude's Little Ignorant Crony
                  • Sep 2004
                  • 24761

                  #9
                  Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                  Like said this morning, what is Peters without the Bills? Nothing.

                  If he doesn't report it's going to hurt him more than the Bills.

                  D & S Sports



                  Comment

                  • bigbub2352
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 5386

                    #10
                    Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                    I completely agree with this article and the Realfootball365 1, and i hate to say it but Vic Carucci said the same exact stuff last nite, on Channel 7 Sports Extra local TV, he said that Peters is wrong in what he is doing and should be at camp and not taking such a hard stance

                    Im sorry but i know this is a business now, but No Loyality or class

                    Especially with 3yrs left

                    U should trust the organization after all they did for him, UDFA as a TE to probowl LT doesnt happen over nite
                    XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

                    Comment

                    • Philagape
                      WIN NOW
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 19432

                      #11
                      Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                      What are the Bills without Peters? Losers.
                      "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

                      "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

                      2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
                      2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

                      Comment

                      • TacklingDummy
                        Unreachable Douche
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 71724

                        #12
                        Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                        Originally posted by shelby
                        i think the FO should shut up and pay him.
                        Just my opinion.
                        They do. And he is signed for another 3 years,
                        If anyone is at fault here its Peters.

                        Comment

                        • TacklingDummy
                          Unreachable Douche
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 71724

                          #13
                          Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                          Originally posted by Philagape
                          What are the Bills without Peters? Losers.
                          What have they been with Peters? Losers.

                          Comment

                          • DraftBoy
                            Administrator
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 107452

                            #14
                            Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                            We don't sign Peters to a long term deal our season, and likely our next one is in the crapper. Franchise LT don't fall out of trees. Do we really want to play this game and risk 2-3 more years of no playoffs? Personally he deserves the money (which btw we all agree on) and if we don't pay him our team is in deep trouble.
                            COMING SOON...
                            Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                            We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                            Comment

                            • OpIv37
                              Acid Douching Asswipe
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 101230

                              #15
                              Re: Bills Have Upper Hand With Peters

                              Originally posted by RockStar36
                              Like said this morning, what is Peters without the Bills? Nothing.

                              If he doesn't report it's going to hurt him more than the Bills.
                              What he said:

                              Originally posted by Philagape
                              What are the Bills without Peters? Losers.
                              MiKiDo Facebook
                              MiKiDo Website

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X