Hall of Fame

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DrGraves
    Registered User
    • Mar 2008
    • 2693

    Hall of Fame

    Alright, recently I've heard debates over whether or not Andre Reed will get into the hall of fame. I think it is a no brainer that he should be in. Currently their are 19 modren era WR in the hall of fame.

    Lance Alworth 1962-1972
    Raymond Berry 1955-1967
    Fred Biletnikoff 1965-1978
    Tom Fears 1948-1956
    Elroy (Crazylegs) Hirsch (also HB) 1946-1956
    Michael Irvin 1988-1999
    Charlie Joiner 1969-1986
    Steve Largent 1976-1989
    Dante Lavelli 1946-1956
    James Lofton 1978-1993 Don Maynard 1958, 1960-1973
    Tommy McDonald 1957-1968
    Bobby Mitchell (also HB) 1958-1968
    Art Monk 1980-1995
    Pete Pihos 1947-1955
    John Stallworth 1974-1987
    Lynn Swann 1974-1982
    Charley Taylor (also HB) 1964-1975, 1977
    Paul Warfield 1964-1977


    Andre is 9th all time in recieving yards. 4 superbowls... a great WR. he should be in.


    Interesting Question. Now Eric moulds is 3th in recieving yards at ~10000, and has over 800 receptions, 50 more than michael irvin... I know his carrer is bacially over, but if he could manage 1000 more yards he would jump into the top 20. i know he wouldnt have any rings or really any playoff exp. at all, but wouldnt those number make him a canidate for the hall at the very least?

    I know he is not a hall of famer so don't ridicule me but, i just want to save bravo Eric... you are awesome, one of my all time favorite Bills.

    BTW, STEVE TASKER SHOULD BE IN THE HALL OF FAME, GREATEST ST EVER.
  • LtFinFan66
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 47199

    #2
    Re: Hall of Fame

    Reed and Tasker should be in

    Comment

    • Romes
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 5766

      #3
      Re: Hall of Fame

      Michael Irvin shouldn't be in the Hall and neither should Moulds.
      Originally posted by paladin warrior
      RALPH is drove me nut.

      Comment

      • tampabay25690
        Registered User
        • Feb 2004
        • 9670

        #4
        Re: Hall of Fame

        Originally posted by Romes
        Michael Irvin shouldn't be in the Hall and neither should Moulds.
        IRVIN making it in the HALL were pitty votes and that is it...
        GO Gators!!!!!!
        GO GATORS!!

        Comment

        • Philagape
          WIN NOW
          • Jul 2002
          • 19432

          #5
          Re: Hall of Fame

          I think stats are used too much in discussing Hall of Fame credentials. It's not the Hall of Stats. No way should Moulds get in.
          "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

          "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

          2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
          2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

          Comment

          • THATHURMANATOR
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 69112

            #6
            Re: Hall of Fame

            I don't get all the hype on Tasker. Sure I liked the guy but he barely played during the course of a game. He was in there maybe 10 plays max. How should he be a hall of famer?

            Comment

            • THATHURMANATOR
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 69112

              #7
              Re: Hall of Fame

              Originally posted by tampabay25690
              IRVIN making it in the HALL were pitty votes and that is it...
              Bull****. He was one of the best receivers of his era and won multiple superbowls.

              Comment

              • THATHURMANATOR
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 69112

                #8
                Re: Hall of Fame

                Originally posted by Philagape
                I think stats are used too much in discussing Hall of Fame credentials. It's not the Hall of Stats. No way should Moulds get in.
                Agreed.

                Comment

                • THATHURMANATOR
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 69112

                  #9
                  Re: Hall of Fame

                  Originally posted by Romes
                  Michael Irvin shouldn't be in the Hall and neither should Moulds.
                  Irvin is no doubt a hall of famer.

                  Do you think Swann or Stallworth should be in then?(Especially Swann)

                  Comment

                  • Romes
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 5766

                    #10
                    Re: Hall of Fame

                    Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
                    Irvin is no doubt a hall of famer.

                    Do you think Swann or Stallworth should be in then?(Especially Swann)
                    No. I think they were too lenient on letting WR in the past. What sucks is that now that there are a ton in there they are reluctant to put guys in that deserve to go like Monk and Reed. Monk should have been in before Irvin.
                    Originally posted by paladin warrior
                    RALPH is drove me nut.

                    Comment

                    • THATHURMANATOR
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 69112

                      #11
                      Re: Hall of Fame

                      I don't disagree that Monk should have been in earlier you can't say Irvin is not a HOF.

                      Comment

                      • Romes
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 5766

                        #12
                        Re: Hall of Fame

                        He probably is HoF but I'm biased...I can't stand the guy.

                        It would have been nice if they at least made him wait a bit longer.
                        Originally posted by paladin warrior
                        RALPH is drove me nut.

                        Comment

                        • Dr. Lecter
                          Zero for Zero!
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 67946

                          #13
                          Re: Hall of Fame

                          Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
                          I don't get all the hype on Tasker. Sure I liked the guy but he barely played during the course of a game. He was in there maybe 10 plays max. How should he be a hall of famer?
                          Because he was dominant at his role and was in more than 10 plays a game easily.

                          If you figure that each team punts 4 times: (8 plays), kicks off 4 times (8 more, 16 total), kicks 2 EP (4 more, 20 total) and kicks 2 FGs (4 more, 24 total) you have much more than 10 a game.

                          Fact is he was the most dominant ST player of all time and made teams revise how they played against the Bills STs and also changed the role of ST players. He was an original and changed the game.


                          He should be in the HoF.
                          Originally posted by mysticsoto
                          Lecter is right in everything he said.

                          Comment

                          • THATHURMANATOR
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 69112

                            #14
                            Re: Hall of Fame

                            Eh Special teamers are guys who couldn't be full time players. None should be hall of famers.

                            Comment

                            • LtBillsFan66
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 35553

                              #15
                              Re: Hall of Fame

                              Irvin belongs in the hall.
                              Reed belongs in the hall, IMO.
                              Tasker doesn't, IMO.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X