If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
The Bills (No. 23) might be inclined to trade up with the Browns to snatch one of the last defensive linemen in the first round. The Browns might only net a fifth-round choice by dropping two notches, but they could rationalize the value of taking a cornerback at No. 23.
This, IMO, would be a very good move. We would only lose a fifth round pick and we would jump the Jets seem to have simliar needs to ours. This sounds like just speculation but it seems very reasonable. I would not mind if this happened tomorrow morning.
Schoebel, reports are they are looking to draft DT, WR, OL, and S. All those seem to be positions that we would be eyeing too. Why do you think it is so ridiculous?
The Jets very well could take a DL with their second pick. Rumor is they're looking at a wr and a de with their first two picks. If moving up 2 spots insured us a top DE, I'm all for it.
If thats the logic were gonna use, then why dont we jump in front of Denver? And New England, and everybody else!?! I dont think NYJ are gonna take a DE, thats the only area that they're actually decent at. They need LB's, WR's, and DB's bad.
Originally posted by Schobel94 If thats the logic were gonna use, then why dont we jump in front of Denver? And New England, and everybody else!?! I dont think NYJ are gonna take a DE, thats the only area that they're actually decent at. They need LB's, WR's, and DB's bad.
Thats some of the dumbest logic I have heard. It would take practically all our picks to move up past those guys. Moving up 2 spots will only cost us a fifth round pick. A fifth round pick for the chance to pick a solid DL and screw your division rival. I think its worth it.
As for them needing LB's, WR's and DB's... that is not what all the reports out there are saying. CT is right almost everything out there has them taking WR/DL in the first round.
It makes sense if the right guy there. If TD really wants a certain DL, I have no problem giving up a 5th rounder to get him, especially if it means the jets wont
IF TRUE: TD will wait to see who is available at #21 and then weigh on what the Jets did at #13. If they drafted DL, then TD isn't likely to move up. If the Jets draft a different position, then TD could very well move up to insure drafting someone like Haynes
Tweet
Comment