Tweet
- Trent vs Hasselback. Great match up. Trent is a QB that reminds alot of Hasselback. Hasselback wins as the individual QB, but loses at this game. With Trent having healthy WRs who would still probably beat the Seahawks recievers if they were healthy, Hasselback will struggle. But as a 1 on 1 competition, Hasselback is the better of the 2.
- Lynch vs any Seattle RBs. Lynch all the way. Jones could be a 3rd RB, Forcett we still dont know about, and Morris, ha, sammy is better than him. Lynch is at least a top 10 back. LYNCH ALL THE WAY
- WR- Unfair, but for this game, id say buffalo. Only because they have a 1st string caliber player playing WR and not a 5th. The match up closes in though at TE. We both suck. But overall, buffalo wins this games WR match up.
- OL- Best match up so far. With Peters we would be tied, but without him, we are very close but fall short. In the next comming years with Butler being more of a vet, we would dominate seattle, but for now Seattle wins.
- DL- Seattle. 2nd best DL in the league.
- LB- see above^
- DB- Id give this advantage to Buffalo. We dont have a Trufant, but we do have 5 CBs that are a caliber of being in the top of anyones Depth chart. McGee would probably be a number 2, same with Greer, McKelvin would be a 3 just because hes a rookie, and Youboty would be a 3. Great depth. Remember, this is just my opinion so dont jump all over this. I believe are corners are great. Alot of people dont, but I do. For safties, Whitner should be alot better. I dont realy know what seattle has, but maybe thats because they dont have much? All I know is buffalo wins this battle.
- Special teams. Buffalo is the best in the league. End of story.
Tally- Buffalo- 4
Seattle- 4
This equals a close game. I do think buffalo has the edge, but thats only in THIS game. If the seattle players were healthy, they would have the edge with the WRs and would win.
Comment