If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
wow. lets take a step back and realize we played a team with no WR's and a weak-a** running game. if we can stifle the Jags, then I'll be leaning more your way but lets not get too crazy.
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
Originally posted by pinkdogg32
wow. lets take a step back and realize we played a team with no WR's and a weak-a** running game. if we can stifle the Jags, then I'll be leaning more your way but lets not get too crazy.
agreed. The D looked damn good but was only one game. If they can do what they did yesterday continuously, then they can be compared to some of the great D's we've had in the past.
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
Originally posted by OpIv37
agreed. The D looked damn good but was only one game. If they can do what they did yesterday continuously, then they can be compared to some of the great D's we've had in the past.
Wow getting Op to say our d was "damn good" is a huge accomplishment in itself.
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
Originally posted by pinkdogg32
wow. lets take a step back and realize we played a team with no WR's and a weak-a** running game. if we can stifle the Jags, then I'll be leaning more your way but lets not get too crazy.
Exactly! We won a game which we were supposed to win, and I'm happy about that.
Blackonyx: I will give you one thing. This could be the best Special Teams unit we have ever had, and that's saying a lot.
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
I loved what I saw from our defense, but I still say that if the Seahawks had receivers out there that could actually catch the ball, it would have been a lot closer. I saw so many drops and their receivers were pretty pathetic!
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
Originally posted by Mikey82
I loved what I saw from our defense, but I still say that if the Seahawks had receivers out there that could actually catch the ball, it would have been a lot closer. I saw so many drops and their receivers were pretty pathetic!
That's right. And let's not forget that 2 scores belonged to STs. They won't be able to do that every week and our offense needs to make sure they can score and win without help from STs. The game would have been alot closer without those 2 scores and we'd have bitten all the nails off our fingers up and until the end.
Re: I'm going to say it. This defense might be better than Bruce,Phil & Co.!
We also wreaked havoc against a very good line and QB. I was very impressed with MH's pocket presence. He may have single-handily kept Buffalo's sack total out of double digits.
If we continue to get pressure like that every game, nobody will want to face this defense.
Comment