One of the things that irritates me is that we never seem to come to a conclusion about a premise, regardless of evidence.
Let's bury one thing here.
The concept that our training camp is "Club Jauron," and that the staff's decision to practice the way we do in camp, specifically, the number of two a days, leads us to not being prepared early, and is a factor in injuries.
We are 2-0, with no serious injuries in our first two games, and anything from here forward is clearly not the result of running or not running two-a-days with a lot of guys who are no longer here.
Can we at least draw that conclusion, or are we going to read the same nonsense next year?
Can I get an RIP to this premise?
Let's bury one thing here.
The concept that our training camp is "Club Jauron," and that the staff's decision to practice the way we do in camp, specifically, the number of two a days, leads us to not being prepared early, and is a factor in injuries.
We are 2-0, with no serious injuries in our first two games, and anything from here forward is clearly not the result of running or not running two-a-days with a lot of guys who are no longer here.
Can we at least draw that conclusion, or are we going to read the same nonsense next year?
Can I get an RIP to this premise?
Comment