What happened there? I was at the bar and didn't get to hear the experts explain that call.
The 2 pt conversion
Collapse
X
-
The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by notaconThe biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.comTags: None
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Well, that explanation is clear as mud, sounds like that guy is brilliant - do you have a link? Old Soloman couldn't say WHY it wasn't "converted"?Originally posted by notaconThe biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by Cntrygal
Well, that explanation is clear as mud, sounds like that guy is brilliant - do you have a link? Old Soloman couldn't say WHY it wasn't "converted"?
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by Cntrygal
Well, that explanation is clear as mud, sounds like that guy is brilliant - do you have a link? Old Soloman couldn't say WHY it wasn't "converted"?
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by The SpazHuh? It was a penalty which is why it didn't count.Originally posted by notaconThe biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by CntrygalI should've quoted Block O's post for that reply. I know there was a penalty - but couldn't hear what it was (bar noise and all).
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
they claimed royal didn't cover the tackle... and it was a mistake. from what i saw he did...
but it's no big dealMy wife told me that if I had a dollar for every girl who found me unattractive, girls would find me VERY attractive.
MY WIFE SAID THAT!!!
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by Ingtar33they claimed royal didn't cover the tackle... and it was a mistake. from what i saw he did...
A WR - I believe Lee Evans - covered Royal. And since Royal wears a # in the 80s, he cannot be covered.
Eligible numbers must be in eligible positions and ineligible numbers must be in ineligible positions. If they want to change their status, they must report to the referee who will then notify the other team. Obviously, the Bills didn't do that.Buffalo Bills Now! and NFL Now! podcasts
And every Saturday at 11am on WGR
"A good name is more desirable than great riches, and high esteem is better than silver and gold."
Class Character Commitment Consistency Courage
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Originally posted by Coach SalThat's not what they called.
A WR - I believe Lee Evans - covered Royal. And since Royal wears a # in the 80s, he cannot be covered.
Eligible numbers must be in eligible positions and ineligible numbers must be in ineligible positions. If they want to change their status, they must report to the referee who will then notify the other team. Obviously, the Bills didn't do that.
If Royal is covered he becomes ineligible, but the formation is not illegal. If Royal goes downfield, it can be an ineligible man downfield call, but the formation is legal.
Or is the rule different than in college, where a similar thing happened in the Michigan game and Wisconsin was called for ineligible man downfield.
This morning on 97 Rock, Mark Kelso said he looked through the rulebook and what the Bills did was legal, but he will continue to look for clarification and thet he thinks the ref screwed up.Originally posted by mysticsotoLecter is right in everything he said.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
OK. Sorry to bring this back up, but I finally found it in the rule book. Assuming Royal WAS covered by a WR, the official made the correct call:
Section 3 Changes in Position
Article 1 An offensive player wearing the number of an ineligible pass receiver (50-79 and 90-99) is permitted to line up in the position of an eligible pass receiver (1-49 and 80-89), and an offensive player wearing the number of an eligible pass receiver is permitted to line up in the position of an ineligible pass receiver, provided that he immediately reports the change in his eligibility status to the Referee, who will inform the defensive team.
Buffalo Bills Now! and NFL Now! podcasts
And every Saturday at 11am on WGR
"A good name is more desirable than great riches, and high esteem is better than silver and gold."
Class Character Commitment Consistency Courage
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: The 2 pt conversion
Thanks!Originally posted by notaconThe biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com
Comment
-
Comment