So Derek Fine could take up a roster spot with his injury but not Angelo? I don't really care but that doesn't make sense.
Derek Fine but not Angelo Crowell?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Derek Fine but not Angelo Crowell?
Originally posted by patmoran2006Pro Front office = We taught him a lesson. he screwed us, we screwed him.
Anti Front Office= The Bills made it personal instead of business, he could've been on the field soon and is a lot better than Ellison for the stretch run..
There ya go..
Comment
-
-
Re: Derek Fine but not Angelo Crowell?
Originally posted by mayotmReasonable person = I don't know. I'm not privy to all the details. I don't know the extent of Crowell's injury. I don't think I'm smarter than those who are actually employees of the NFL.
Just because someone works for the NFL or one of its teams doesn't make them smart.
I would wager that lots of people posting on this forum are alot smarter then people working for the NFL.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Derek Fine but not Angelo Crowell?
Originally posted by EDSReally?
Just because someone works for the NFL or one of its teams doesn't make them smart.
I would wager that lots of people posting on this forum are alot smarter then people working for the NFL.
Comment
-
-
Re: Derek Fine but not Angelo Crowell?
The bottom line is that Crowell screwed-up. I have NEVER heard of a player opting for surgery 3 days before the start of the season. Fine had surgery before the season started, so the Bills knew his timeframe to return.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment