Log in

View Full Version : You're Quentin Jammer


Romes
10-20-2008, 02:51 AM
...and this is what you see.

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/1c/fullj.44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba/44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba-getty-81706070rs010_san_diego_cha.jpg

:lolpoint: jammer
Luisito23
10-20-2008, 02:58 AM
:surrender :surrender :surrender!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Buffalogic
10-20-2008, 03:26 AM
Lol...that's a scary pic for defenses.
thenry20
10-20-2008, 03:29 AM
Our running game scares no one but die hard Bills fans such as myself. Sorry but I'm not about to wet myself when Lynch only gets 70 yards every week.
hydro
10-20-2008, 06:09 AM
Our running game scares no one but die hard Bills fans such as myself. Sorry but I'm not about to wet myself when Lynch only gets 70 yards every week.
You're getting ahead of yourself and trying to hard to diss our run game. Everyone knows that is the weakness of the offense. But that isn't the point of the thread. :up:
Dozerdog
10-20-2008, 07:02 AM
http://yeinjee.com/food/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/pancake-0001.jpg
jmb1099
10-20-2008, 07:49 AM
Awesome pic!

Regarding the running game: It needs improvement, but does it need it right now? We're actually averaging about 100 yards a game between Lynch and Jackson. So while it could be better it isn't dramatically awful either.
billsfanone
10-20-2008, 08:22 AM
Followed by this

http://ftp.pcworld.com/pub/screencams/lighthouse-sky.jpg
madness
10-20-2008, 08:26 AM
Awesome pic!

Regarding the running game: It needs improvement, but does it need it right now? We're actually averaging about 100 yards a game between Lynch and Jackson. So while it could be better it isn't dramatically awful either.

Schonert also used short passes to the backs as part of the run game. Add those yards in and our run game doesn't look like a weakness at all. Some people just have trouble seeing the big picture.
Confused
10-20-2008, 09:00 AM
Look at it this way, with our two back system, we are not poundling the crap out of marshawn making him run 25-30 times a game. Meaning he'll be healthy for years. With Trent's surgical passing attack, we dont need to pound the ball as much.
hydro
10-20-2008, 09:03 AM
Look at it this way, with our two back system, we are not poundling the crap out of marshawn making him run 25-30 times a game. Meaning he'll be healthy for years. With Trent's surgical passing attack, we dont need to pound the ball as much.

You know, this makes a lot of sense. Marshawn already takes a lot of beating on the 20> carries he gets a game. Imagine his health if he had 25+ a game carrying the whole load...
blackonyx89
10-20-2008, 09:03 AM
...and this is what you see.

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/1c/fullj.44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba/44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba-getty-81706070rs010_san_diego_cha.jpg

:lolpoint: jammer

Jammer got JAMMED!!!
blackonyx89
10-20-2008, 09:04 AM
Followed by this

http://ftp.pcworld.com/pub/screencams/lighthouse-sky.jpg

Post of the Day!!!! (Jammer) My the sky looks pretty. LOL! :D:
hydro
10-20-2008, 09:07 AM
That's not quite an accurate picture though. The skies were cloud free alllll day :D
Cntrygal
10-20-2008, 06:29 PM
Anyone have a picture of Jammer getting hit? :D
Griff
10-20-2008, 08:55 PM
Our running game scares no one but die hard Bills fans such as myself. Sorry but I'm not about to wet myself when Lynch only gets 70 yards every week.

so you have no idea about how the running game and short yardage passing game works in a west coast offense do you?
trapezeus
10-20-2008, 09:39 PM
no wonder jammer chose to take on jackson....too bad it was just as bad as if he tookk on dockery
Sportsuser101
10-20-2008, 10:08 PM
We're 23rd in the league in rushing yards per game. Jackson is a better running back then Lynch. Everybody says oh lets keep Lynch healthy for years. If he's not a top 10 running back then what are we keeping him healthy for? I just don't get the obsession with Lynch just because we're winning and he was a 1st round pick.
hydro
10-20-2008, 10:18 PM
We're 23rd in the league in rushing yards per game. Jackson is a better running back then Lynch. Everybody says oh lets keep Lynch healthy for years. If he's not a top 10 running back then what are we keeping him healthy for? I just don't get the obsession with Lynch just because we're winning and he was a 1st round pick.

Do you have a personal vedetta against the guy? He never consistently gets holes. You switch him and Adrian Peterson, Lynch becomes the guy that everyone talks about. He too would have probably won the rookie of the year award behind that vikings line.
Sportsuser101
10-20-2008, 10:24 PM
Do you have a personal vedetta against the guy? He never consistently gets holes. You switch him and Adrian Peterson, Lynch becomes the guy that everyone talks about. He too would have probably won the rookie of the year award behind that vikings line.

Lynch averages 3.5 YPC, Jackson 4.3 YPC. Lynch averages 5.9 per catch, Jackson 9.0 per catch. Jackson is the better blocker as well and has better breakaway speed. What else is there to get?
mchurchfie
10-21-2008, 02:01 AM
...and this is what you see.

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/1c/fullj.44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba/44a3d77f37bd84a457e856a75b5825ba-getty-81706070rs010_san_diego_cha.jpg

:lolpoint: jammer
:roflmao:Jammer got PUNKED on that play.