This is not a Lynch bashing thread, but I believe Lynch would be more effective if we brought him off the bench after having Jackson soften up the defense. It's obvious that Jackson is a far more instinctive runner than Lynch and I believe Lynch's 1-2 yard runs in the begining of games slows our offense down, bringing Lynch in on short yardage plays and having him fresh in the second half would turn his 1-2 yard runs in the first two quarters into 8-15 yard runs in the second half once the defense is tired and simply will not be able to bring him down (much like Marion Barber with Parcells and Wade's 1st year in Dallas), just a suggestion, your thoughts...
Jackson Should Start
Collapse
X
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
no..........i like jackson but no. running lynch up the middle 85% of the timeis starting to get old. he has gained most of his yards when bouncing out to the outside. i say run more sweeps and more tosses to the outside and utilize his skills. if you look up any clip on him even from college any big yard gains are from the outside.2009 AFC East Division Champs 12-4
POZ will lead us to the promise land
"That which does not kill me,
will only make me stronger"
Nietzsche
-
👍 4
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by buffalony85This is not a Lynch bashing thread, but I believe Lynch would be more effective if we brought him off the bench after having Jackson soften up the defense. It's obvious that Jackson is a far more instinctive runner than Lynch and I believe Lynch's 1-2 yard runs in the begining of games slows our offense down, bringing Lynch in on short yardage plays and having him fresh in the second half would turn his 1-2 yard runs in the first two quarters into 8-15 yard runs in the second half once the defense is tired and simply will not be able to bring him down (much like Marion Barber with Parcells and Wade's 1st year in Dallas), just a suggestion, your thoughts...
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by syracuse76no..........i like jackson but no. running lynch up the middle 85% of the timeis starting to get old. he has gained most of his yards when bouncing out to the outside. i say run more sweeps and more tosses to the outside and utilize his skills. if you look up any clip on him even from college any big yard gains are from the outside.
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Lynch goes in, pounds the rock. Tires the defense. Creates an advantage. In comes Jackson. He takes advantage of the tired D, and he gets better yards per rush. But Lynch is the workhorse and #1.
Jackson is what we call a "change of pace back".I am The Batman.
-
👍 9
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by hydrosmakIf they do that it will seem as if Lynch is a bust. I don't think they ever do it for that fact.
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by hydrosmakIf they do that it will seem as if Lynch is a bust. I don't think they ever do it for that fact.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Lynch is the starting running back. That said, I'm not at all opposed to Jackson getting more first half carries, and giving the rock to marshawn 15 times in the second half.Originally posted by TopdogDamn , your're showing you're ignorance!Originally posted by mercyruleI love Weiner.Originally posted by mercyrulealso cheese
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by buffalony85This is not a Lynch bashing thread, but I believe Lynch would be more effective if we brought him off the bench after having Jackson soften up the defense. It's obvious that Jackson is a far more instinctive runner than Lynch and I believe Lynch's 1-2 yard runs in the begining of games slows our offense down, bringing Lynch in on short yardage plays and having him fresh in the second half would turn his 1-2 yard runs in the first two quarters into 8-15 yard runs in the second half once the defense is tired and simply will not be able to bring him down (much like Marion Barber with Parcells and Wade's 1st year in Dallas), just a suggestion, your thoughts...
That said, it is Marshawn that makes him a more effective runner, and not the other way araound. It is ML that "softens up" defenses, and not the other way around. Fred Jackson is not a runner who wears down defenses.
Marshawn makes yardage despite poor blocking....he can make a no gain into a 2-3 yard game just because of his AMAZING leg drive...this guy ALWAYS falls forward.
Fred Jackson is a runner (and pass receiver) who is better in space. You can't compare him to Marion Barber....ML is more like Barber...a BULL.
-
👍 5
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
Originally posted by Mad BomberI LOVE Freddy Jackson (see my thread on this subject).
That said, it is Marshawn that makes him a more effective runner, and not the other way araound. It is ML that "softens up" defenses, and not the other way around. Fred Jackson is not a runner who wears down defenses.
Marshawn makes yardage despite poor blocking....he can make a no gain into a 2-3 yard game just because of his AMAZING leg drive...this guy ALWAYS falls forward.
Fred Jackson is a runner (and pass receiver) who is better in space. You can't compare him to Marion Barber....ML is more like Barber...a BULL.Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?
Comment
-
-
Re: Jackson Should Start
I don't think you could do that. I like Jackson and I do believe that Lynch needs to change somethings with his running style, but you can't start Jackson. What they need to do is work with Lynch on how to read his blocks better...he just doesn't seem to have a feel for finding the hole...no matter how small it may be.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment